Cited by 226Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: prehospital management

Open access
Ong, Marcus Eng Hock, Perkins, Gavin D, Cariou, Alain·2018·The Lancet

Abstract

Sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is the most time-critical medical emergency. In the second paper of this Series on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, we considered important issues in the prehospital management of cardiac arrest. Successful resuscitation relies on a strong chain of survival with the community, dispatch centre, ambulance, and hospital working together. Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation has the greatest impact on survival. If the community response does not restart the heart, resuscitation is continued by emergency medical services' staff. However, the best approaches for airway management and the effectiveness of currently used drug treatments are uncertain. Prognostic factors and rules for termination of resuscitation could guide the duration of a resuscitation attempt and decision to transport to hospital. If return of spontaneous circulation is achieved, the focus of treatment shifts to stabilisation, restoration of normal physiological parameters, and transportation to hospital for ongoing care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30316-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increases in DNACPR decisions and especially use of blanket CPR exclusion criteria such as age may introduce selection bias and hamper the generalisability of the research results, as well as their applicability to normal conditions.

    “Lastly, increases in DNACPR decisions and especially use of blanket CPR exclusion criteria such as age 87,88,385,390,393 may introduce selection bias and hamper the generalisability of the research results, as well as their applicability to normal conditions.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ong, M. E. H., Perkins, G. D., & Cariou, A.
Affiliations
  • SingHealth (SG)
  • Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
Corresponding author
Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
391
Issue
10124
Pages
980-988
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2791873328
Cited by
226
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Deakin University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, prehospital care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, chain of survival, emergency medical services, community response, airway management, resuscitation drugs, prognostic factors, termination of resuscitation, return of spontaneous circulation, patient stabilization, hospital transport
MeSH terms
Electric Countershock, Emergency Medical Services, Humans, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review