Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Burmester, Gerd R, Kremer, Joel M, Van den Bosch, Filip, Kivitz, Alan, Bessette, Louis, Li, Yihan, Zhou, Yijie, Othman, Ahmed A, Pangan, Aileen L, Camp, Heidi S·2018·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Upadacitinib is a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and was efficacious in phase 2 studies in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed to assess the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Methods This study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 150 sites in 35 countries. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with active rheumatoid arthritis for 3 months or longer, who had received csDMARDs for at least 3 months with a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before study entry, and had an inadequate response to at least one of the following csDMARDs: methotrexate, sulfasalazine, or leflunomide. Using interactive response technology, we randomly assigned patients receiving stable background csDMARDs (2:2:1:1) to receive a once-daily extended-release formulation of upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg, or placebo, for 12 weeks. Patients, investigators, and the funder were masked to allocation. After 12 weeks, patients taking placebo received 15 mg or 30 mg of upadacitinib once daily, according to the prespecified randomisation assignment. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients at week 12 who achieved 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20), and a 28-joint disease activity score using C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) of 3·2 or less. We did efficacy analyses in the full analysis set of all randomly assig…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31115-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Smolen, 2016, Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force, Ann Rheum Dis, 75, 3, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524 · DOI
  2. van der Heijde, 2012, Timing and magnitude of initial change in disease activity score 28 predicts the likelihood of achieving low disease activity at 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol: a post-hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 trial, J Rheumatol, 39, 1326, 10.3899/jrheum.111171 · DOI
  3. Aletaha, 2007, Disease activity early in the course of treatment predicts response to therapy after one year in rheumatoid arthritis patients, Arthritis Rheum, 56, 3226, 10.1002/art.22943 · DOI
  4. Singh, 2016, 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Rheumatol, 68, 1, 10.1002/art.39480 · DOI
  5. Smolen, 2017, EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update, Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 960, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Burmester, 2017, Novel treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis, Lancet, 389, 2338, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31491-5 · DOI
  7. Burmester, 2013, Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial, Lancet, 381, 451, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X · DOI
  8. Genovese, 2016, Baricitinib in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis, N Engl J Med, 374, 1243, 10.1056/NEJMoa1507247 · DOI
  9. Kavanaugh, 2017, Filgotinib (GLPG0634/GS-6034), an oral selective JAK1 inhibitor, is effective as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomised, dose-finding study (DARWIN 2), Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 1009, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210105 · DOI
  10. Westhovens, 2016, Filgotinib (GLPG0634/GS-6034), an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor, is effective in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and insufficient response to MTX: results from a randomised, dose-finding study (DARWIN 1), Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 998, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210104 · DOI
  11. Kremer, 2016, A phase IIb study of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, Arthritis Rheumatol, 68, 2867, 10.1002/art.39801 · DOI
  12. Genovese, 2016, Efficacy and safety of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in a phase IIb study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate, Arthritis Rheumatol, 68, 2857, 10.1002/art.39808 · DOI
  13. Mohamed, 2018, Pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib with the clinical regimens of the extended-release formulation utilized in rheumatoid arthritis phase 3 trials, Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev, 10.1002/cpdd.462 · DOI
  14. Aletaha, 2010, 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative, Ann Rheum Dis, 69, 1580, 10.1136/ard.2010.138461 · DOI
  15. Felson, 1995, American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Rheum, 38, 727, 10.1002/art.1780380602 · DOI
  16. Wells, 2009, Ann Rheum Dis, 68, 954, 10.1136/ard.2007.084459 · DOI
  17. Bykerk, 2012, The new ACR/EULAR remission criteria: rationale for developing new criteria for remission, Rheumatology (Oxford), 51, 16, 10.1093/rheumatology/kes281 · DOI
  18. Woodworth, 2007, Standardizing assessment and reporting of adverse effects in rheumatology clinical trials II: the Rheumatology Common Toxicity Criteria v.2.0, J Rheumatol, 34, 1401
  19. Bretz, 2009, A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures, Stat Med, 28, 586, 10.1002/sim.3495 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Dossing, 2014, Interpreting trial results following use of different intention-to-treat approaches for preventing attrition bias: a meta-epidemiological study protocol, BMJ Open, 4, e005297, 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005297 · DOI
  21. Klunder, 2017, Population pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib in healthy subjects and subjects with rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of phase I and II clinical trials, Clin Pharmacokinet, 10.1007/s40262-017-0605-6 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Dougados, 2017, Baricitinib in patients with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic DMARDs: results from the RA-BUILD study, Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 88, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210094 · DOI
  23. Kremer, 2013, Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial, Ann Intern Med, 159, 253, 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00006 · DOI
  24. da Silva, 2011, Impact of impaired morning function on the lives and well-being of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Scand J Rheumatol Suppl, 125, 6, 10.3109/03009742.2011.566434 · DOI
  25. Genovese, 2018, Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial, Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31116-4 · DOI · Paper page
  26. O'Shea, 2015, The JAK-STAT pathway: impact on human disease and therapeutic intervention, Annu Rev Med, 66, 311, 10.1146/annurev-med-051113-024537 · DOI
  27. Cohen, 2017, Long-term safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis up to 8.5 years: integrated analysis of data from the global clinical trials, Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 1253, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210457 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Burmester, G. R., Kremer, J. M., Van den Bosch, F., Kivitz, A., Bessette, L., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Othman, A. A., Pangan, A. L., & Camp, H. S.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
391
Issue
10139
Pages
2503-2512
ISSN
0140-6736
Cited by
373
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review