The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial
Abstract
Background Upadacitinib is a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and was efficacious in phase 2 studies in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed to assess the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Methods This study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 150 sites in 35 countries. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with active rheumatoid arthritis for 3 months or longer, who had received csDMARDs for at least 3 months with a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before study entry, and had an inadequate response to at least one of the following csDMARDs: methotrexate, sulfasalazine, or leflunomide. Using interactive response technology, we randomly assigned patients receiving stable background csDMARDs (2:2:1:1) to receive a once-daily extended-release formulation of upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg, or placebo, for 12 weeks. Patients, investigators, and the funder were masked to allocation. After 12 weeks, patients taking placebo received 15 mg or 30 mg of upadacitinib once daily, according to the prespecified randomisation assignment. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients at week 12 who achieved 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20), and a 28-joint disease activity score using C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) of 3·2 or less. We did efficacy analyses in the full analysis set of all randomly assig…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The phase III trial of the JAK1-selective inhibitor upadacitinib exhibited efficacy against cases of RA with inadequate response to DMARDs or biologics”
From Targeting Interleukin-6 Signaling in Clinic (2019) · cites this paper as Burmester et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Anderson, J. K., Zimmerman, L., Caplan, L., & Michaud, K. (2011) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20621 · Cited by 260
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Smolen, 2016, Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force, Ann Rheum Dis, 75, 3, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524 · DOI
- van der Heijde, 2012, Timing and magnitude of initial change in disease activity score 28 predicts the likelihood of achieving low disease activity at 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol: a post-hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 trial, J Rheumatol, 39, 1326, 10.3899/jrheum.111171 · DOI
- Aletaha, 2007, Disease activity early in the course of treatment predicts response to therapy after one year in rheumatoid arthritis patients, Arthritis Rheum, 56, 3226, 10.1002/art.22943 · DOI
- Singh, 2016, 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Rheumatol, 68, 1, 10.1002/art.39480 · DOI
- Smolen, 2017, EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update, Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 960, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715 · DOI · Paper page
- Burmester, 2017, Novel treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis, Lancet, 389, 2338, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31491-5 · DOI
- Burmester, 2013, Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial, Lancet, 381, 451, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X · DOI
- Genovese, 2016, Baricitinib in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis, N Engl J Med, 374, 1243, 10.1056/NEJMoa1507247 · DOI
- Kavanaugh, 2017, Filgotinib (GLPG0634/GS-6034), an oral selective JAK1 inhibitor, is effective as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomised, dose-finding study (DARWIN 2), Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 1009, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210105 · DOI
- Westhovens, 2016, Filgotinib (GLPG0634/GS-6034), an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor, is effective in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and insufficient response to MTX: results from a randomised, dose-finding study (DARWIN 1), Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 998, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210104 · DOI
- Kremer, 2016, A phase IIb study of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, Arthritis Rheumatol, 68, 2867, 10.1002/art.39801 · DOI
- Genovese, 2016, Efficacy and safety of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in a phase IIb study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate, Arthritis Rheumatol, 68, 2857, 10.1002/art.39808 · DOI
- Mohamed, 2018, Pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib with the clinical regimens of the extended-release formulation utilized in rheumatoid arthritis phase 3 trials, Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev, 10.1002/cpdd.462 · DOI
- Aletaha, 2010, 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative, Ann Rheum Dis, 69, 1580, 10.1136/ard.2010.138461 · DOI
- Felson, 1995, American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Rheum, 38, 727, 10.1002/art.1780380602 · DOI
- Wells, 2009, Ann Rheum Dis, 68, 954, 10.1136/ard.2007.084459 · DOI
- Bykerk, 2012, The new ACR/EULAR remission criteria: rationale for developing new criteria for remission, Rheumatology (Oxford), 51, 16, 10.1093/rheumatology/kes281 · DOI
- Woodworth, 2007, Standardizing assessment and reporting of adverse effects in rheumatology clinical trials II: the Rheumatology Common Toxicity Criteria v.2.0, J Rheumatol, 34, 1401
- Bretz, 2009, A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures, Stat Med, 28, 586, 10.1002/sim.3495 · DOI · Paper page
- Dossing, 2014, Interpreting trial results following use of different intention-to-treat approaches for preventing attrition bias: a meta-epidemiological study protocol, BMJ Open, 4, e005297, 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005297 · DOI
- Klunder, 2017, Population pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib in healthy subjects and subjects with rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of phase I and II clinical trials, Clin Pharmacokinet, 10.1007/s40262-017-0605-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Dougados, 2017, Baricitinib in patients with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic DMARDs: results from the RA-BUILD study, Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 88, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210094 · DOI
- Kremer, 2013, Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial, Ann Intern Med, 159, 253, 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00006 · DOI
- da Silva, 2011, Impact of impaired morning function on the lives and well-being of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Scand J Rheumatol Suppl, 125, 6, 10.3109/03009742.2011.566434 · DOI
- Genovese, 2018, Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial, Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31116-4 · DOI · Paper page
- O'Shea, 2015, The JAK-STAT pathway: impact on human disease and therapeutic intervention, Annu Rev Med, 66, 311, 10.1146/annurev-med-051113-024537 · DOI
- Cohen, 2017, Long-term safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis up to 8.5 years: integrated analysis of data from the global clinical trials, Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 1253, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210457 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Targeting Interleukin-6 Signaling in Clinic
Kang, S., Tanaka, T., Narazaki, M., & Kishimoto, T. (2019) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.026 · Cited by 904
JAK inhibitors for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases
Jamilloux, Y., El Jammal, T., Vuitton, L., Gerfaud-Valentin, M., Kerever, S., & Sève, P. (2019) · Autoimmunity Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102390 · Cited by 264
Management of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis
Pope, J. E. (2020) · RMD Open · doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001084 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Burmester, G. R., Kremer, J. M., Van den Bosch, F., Kivitz, A., Bessette, L., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Othman, A. A., Pangan, A. L., & Camp, H. S.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 391
- Issue
- 10139
- Pages
- 2503-2512
- ISSN
- 0140-6736
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review