The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies
Open accessAbstract
Optimising the use of caesarean section (CS) is of global concern. Underuse leads to maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Conversely, overuse of CS has not shown benefits and can create harm. Worldwide, the frequency of CS continues to increase, and interventions to reduce unnecessary CSs have shown little success. Identifying the underlying factors for the continuing increase in CS use could improve the efficacy of interventions. In this Series paper, we describe the factors for CS use that are associated with women, families, health professionals, and health-care organisations and systems, and we examine behavioural, psychosocial, health system, and financial factors. We also outline the type and effects of interventions to reduce CS use that have been investigated. Clinical interventions, such as external cephalic version for breech delivery at term, vaginal breech delivery in appropriately selected women, and vaginal birth after CS, could reduce the frequency of CS use. Approaches such as labour companionship and midwife-led care have been associated with higher proportions of physiological births, safer outcomes, and lower health-care costs relative to control groups without these interventions, and with positive maternal experiences, in high-income countries. Such approaches need to be assessed in middle-income and low-income countries. Educational interventions for women should be complemented with meaningful dialogue with health professionals and effective emotional support for women and families. Investing in the training of health professionals, eliminating financial incentives for CS use, and reducing fear of litigation is fundamental. Safe, private, welcoming, and adequately resourced facilities are needed. At the country level, effective medical leadership is essential to ensure CS is used only when indicated. We conclude that interventions to reduce overuse must be multicomponent and locally tailored, addressing women's and health professionals' concerns, as well as health system and financial factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A., & Devane, D. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub4 · Cited by 514
An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation
Brown, C. H., Curran, G., Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Wells, K. B., Jones, L., Collins, L. M., Duan, N., Mittman, B. S., Wallace, A., et al. (2017) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215 · Cited by 509
Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions?
Shepperd, S., Lewin, S., Straus, S., Clarke, M., Eccles, M. P., Fitzpatrick, R., Wong, G., & Sheikh, A. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000086 · Cited by 408
Non‐clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section
Chen, I., Opiyo, N., Tavender, E., Mortazhejri, S., Rader, T., Petkovic, J., Yogasingam, S., Taljaard, M., Agarwal, S., Laopaiboon, M., et al. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005528.pub3 · Cited by 259
Self-citationRouhe, H., Salmela‐Aro, K., Toivanen, R., Tokola, M., Halmesmäki, E., & Saisto, T. (2013) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12011 · Cited by 190
Adaptive Designs for Randomized Trials in Public Health
Brown, C. H., Ten Have, T. R., Jo, B., Dagne, G., Wyman, P. A., Muthén, B., & Gibbons, R. D. (2009) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100223 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children
Sandall, J., Tribe, R. M., Avery, L., Mola, G., Visser, G. H., Homer, C. S., Gibbons, D., Kelly, N. M., Kennedy, H. P., Kidanto, H., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31930-5 · Cited by 1,394
Self-citationThe double burden of malnutrition: aetiological pathways and consequences for health
Wells, J. C., Sawaya, A. L., Wibaek, R., Mwangome, M., Poullas, M. S., Yajnik, C. S., & Demaio, A. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32472-9 · Cited by 993
Harnessing the Power of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Challenges and Opportunities
Chen, Z., Liang, N., Zhang, H., Li, H., Yang, Y., Zong, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Shi, N. (2023) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432 · Cited by 244
Shirzad, M., Shakibazadeh, E., Hajimiri, K., Betran, A. P., Jahanfar, S., Bohren, M. A., Opiyo, N., Long, Q., Kingdon, C., Colomar, M., et al. (2021) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-020-01047-x · Cited by 152
Self-citationBhatia, M., Banerjee, K., Dixit, P., & Dwivedi, L. K. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15022 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Betrán, A. P., Temmerman, M., Kingdon, C., Mohiddin, A., Opiyo, N., Torloni, M. R., Zhang, J., Musana, O., Wanyonyi, S. Z., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Downe, S.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 392
- Issue
- 10155
- Pages
- 1358-1368
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2896447320
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 58.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31927-5
- The paper
- Betrán, A. P., Temmerman, M., Kingdon, C., Mohiddin, A., Opiyo, N., Torloni, M. R., Zhang, J., Musana, O., Wanyonyi, S. Z., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Downe, S. (2018). Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31927-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.