Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Sobhy, Soha, Arroyo-Manzano, David, Murugesu, Nilaani, Karthikeyan, Gayathri, Kumar, Vinoth, Kaur, Inderjeet, Fernandez, Evita, Gundabattula, Sirisha Rao, Betran, Ana Pilar, Khan, Khalid, Zamora, Javier, Thangaratinam, Shakila·2019·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND Universal and timely access to a caesarean section is a key requirement for safe childbirth. We identified the burden of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity, and the risk factors following caesarean sections in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched electronic databases including MEDLINE and Embase (from Jan 1, 1990, to Nov 20, 2017), without language restrictions, for studies on maternal or perinatal outcomes following caesarean sections in LMICs. We excluded studies in high-income countries, those involving non-pregnant women, case reports, and studies published before 1990. Two reviewers undertook the study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction independently. The main outcome being assessed was prevalence of maternal mortality in women undergoing caesarean sections in LMICs. We used a random effects model to synthesise the rate data, and reported the association between risk factors and outcomes using odds ratios with 95% CIs. The study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42015029191. FINDINGS We included 196 studies from 67 LMICs. The risk of maternal death in women who had a caesarean section (116 studies, 2 933 457 caesarean sections) was 7·6 per 1000 procedures (95% CI 6·6-8·6, τ2=0·81); the highest burden was in sub-Saharan Africa (10·9 per 1000; 9·5-12·5, τ2=0·81). A quarter of all women who died in LMICs (72 studies, 27 651 deaths) had undergone a caesarean section (23·8%, 95% CI 21·0-26·7; τ2=0·62). INTERPRETATION Maternal deaths and perinatal deaths following caesarean sections are disproportionately high in LMICs. The timing and urgency of caesarean section pose major risks. FUNDING Ammalife Charity and ELLY Appeal, Barts Charity, and the UK National Institute for Health Research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32386-9

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Oladapo, 2007, Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with elective Caesarean delivery at a university hospital in Nigeria, Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol, 47, 110, 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00695.x · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2007.00695.x
  2. Tadesse, 1996, Caesarean section deliveries at Tikur Anbessa Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia, East Afr Med J, 73, 619
  3. Weiser, 2015, Variability in mortality after caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin hernia repair in low-income and middle-income countries: implications for expanding surgical services, Lancet, 385, S34, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60829-7 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60829-7
  4. Vousden, 2014, Caesarean section at full dilatation: incidence, impact and current management, Obstet Gynaecol, 16, 199, 10.1111/tog.12112 · doi:10.1111/tog.12112
  5. Maswime, 2017, Why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17, 15, 10.1186/s12884-016-1182-7 · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1182-7
  6. Khan, 2006, WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review, Lancet, 367, 1066, 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Seffah, 2014, Vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section: current trends and outlook in Ghana, J West Afr Coll Surg, 4, 1
  8. II, 2016, Neglected obstructed labor and the need to revive the “dying obstetric art of fetal destructive vaginal operations” in the developing countries, Ann Clin Case Rep, 1, 1
  9. Spencer, 2006, Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour, BMJ, 333, 613, 10.1136/bmj.38971.466979.DE · doi:10.1136/bmj.38971.466979.de
  10. Maharaj, 2002, Symphysiotomy and fetal destructive operations, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 16, 117, 10.1053/beog.2001.0259 · doi:10.1053/beog.2001.0259

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Sobhy, S., Arroyo-Manzano, D., Murugesu, N., Karthikeyan, G., Kumar, V., Kaur, I., Fernandez, E., Gundabattula, S. R., Betran, A. P., Khan, K., Zamora, J., & Thangaratinam, S.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
393
Issue
10184
Pages
1973-1982
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2924355349
Cited by
369
References
34
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32386-9
The paper
Sobhy, S., Arroyo-Manzano, D., Murugesu, N., Karthikeyan, G., Kumar, V., Kaur, I., Fernandez, E., Gundabattula, S. R., Betran, A. P., Khan, K., Zamora, J., & Thangaratinam, S. (2019). Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32386-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.