The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor have shown efficacy in the prevention of migraine attacks. We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of fremanezumab, a fully humanised CGRP antibody, in patients with migraine who had previously not responded to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications. METHODS The randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3b FOCUS trial was done at 104 sites (including hospitals, medical centres, research institutes, and group practice clinics) across Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. We enrolled participants aged 18-70 years with episodic or chronic migraine who had documented failure to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications in the past 10 years. Failure was defined as no clinically meaningful improvement after at least 3 months of therapy at a stable dose, as per the treating physician's judgment; discontinuation because of adverse events that made treatment intolerable; or treatment contraindicated or unsuitable for the preventive treatment of migraine for the patient. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by electronic interactive response technology to subcutaneously administered quarterly fremanezumab (month 1, 675 mg; months 2 and 3: placebo), monthly fremanezumab (month 1: 225 mg in episodic migraine and 675 mg in chronic migraine; months 2 and 3: 225 mg in both migraine subgroups), or matched monthly placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was mean change from baseline in the monthly average number of migraine days during the 12-week treatment period. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03308968, and is now completed. FINDINGS Between Nov 10, 2017, and July 6, 2018, 838 participants with episodic (329 [39%]) or chronic (509 [61%]) migraine were randomly assigned to placebo (n=279), quarterly fremanezumab (n=276), or monthly fremanezumab (n=283). Reductions from baseline in monthly average migraine days over 12 weeks were greater versus placebo (least-squares mean [LSM] change -0·6 [SE 0·3]) with quarterly fremanezumab (LSM change -3·7 [0·3]; LSM difference vs placebo -3·1 [95% CI -3·8 to -2·4]; p<0·0001) and with monthly fremanezumab (LSM change -4·1 [0·34]; LSM difference vs placebo -3·5 [-4·2 to -2·8]; p<0·0001). Adverse events were similar for placebo and fremanezumab. Serious adverse events were reported in four (1%) of 277 participants with placebo, two (<1%) of 276 with quarterly fremanezumab, and four (1%) of 285 with monthly fremanezumab. INTERPRETATION Fremanezumab was effective and well tolerated in patients with difficult-to-treat migraine who had previously not responded to up to four classes of migraine preventive medications. FUNDING Teva Pharmaceuticals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version)
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2013) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102413485658 · Cited by 8,229
Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy
Lipton, R. B., Bigal, M. E., Diamond, M., Freitag, F., Reed, M. L., & Stewart, W. F. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21 · Cited by 2,337
Stovner, L. J., Nichols, E., Steiner, T. J., Abd-Allah, F., Abdelalim, A., Al-Raddadi, R. M., Ansha, M. G., Barac, A., Bensenor, I. M., Doan, L. P., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30322-3 · Cited by 1,908
A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine
Goadsby, P. J., Reuter, U., Hallström, Y., Broessner, G., Bonner, J. H., Zhang, F., Sapra, S., Picard, H., Mikol, D. D., & Lenz, R. A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1705848 · Cited by 928
Fremanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine
Silberstein, S. D., Dodick, D. W., Bigal, M. E., Yeung, P. P., Goadsby, P. J., Blankenbiller, T., Grozinski-Wolff, M., Yang, R., Ma, Y., & Aycardi, E. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1709038 · Cited by 792
Self-citationTopiramate for Migraine Prevention<SUBTITLE>A Randomized Controlled Trial</SUBTITLE>
Brandes, J. L. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.8.965 · Cited by 653
Migraine is first cause of disability in under 50s: will health politicians now take notice?
Steiner, T. J., Stovner, L. J., Vos, T., Jensen, R., & Katsarava, Z. (2018) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1186/s10194-018-0846-2 · Cited by 642
ARISE: A Phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine
Dodick, D. W., Ashina, M., Brandes, J. L., Kudrow, D., Lanteri-Minet, M., Osipova, V., Palmer, K., Picard, H., Mikol, D. D., & Lenz, R. A. (2018) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102418759786 · Cited by 566
Self-citationDodick, D. W., Silberstein, S. D., Bigal, M. E., Yeung, P. P., Goadsby, P. J., Blankenbiller, T., Grozinski-Wolff, M., Yang, R., Ma, Y., & Aycardi, E. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.4853 · Cited by 562
Self-citation
Cited by
Diagnosis and management of migraine in ten steps
Eigenbrodt, A. K., Ashina, H., Khan, S., Diener, H.-C., Mitsikostas, D. D., Sinclair, A. J., Pozo-Rosich, P., Martelletti, P., Ducros, A., Lantéri-Minet, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-021-00509-5 · Cited by 594
Self-citationVandervorst, F., Van Deun, L., Van Dycke, A., Paemeleire, K., Reuter, U., Schoenen, J., & Versijpt, J. (2021) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1186/s10194-021-01335-2 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferrari, M. D., Diener, H. C., Ning, X., Galic, M., Cohen, J. M., Yang, R., Mueller, M., Ahn, A. H., Schwartz, Y. C., Grozinski-Wolff, M., Janka, L., & Ashina, M.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 394
- Issue
- 10203
- Pages
- 1030-1040
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2968435022
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 34.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31946-4
- The paper
- Ferrari, M. D., Diener, H. C., Ning, X., Galic, M., Cohen, J. M., Yang, R., Mueller, M., Ahn, A. H., Schwartz, Y. C., Grozinski-Wolff, M., Janka, L., & Ashina, M. (2019). Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31946-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.