The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (SELECT-AXIS 1): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND The JAK pathway is a potential therapeutic target in ankylosing spondylitis. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, parallel-group, phase 2/3 study, SELECT-AXIS 1, enrolled adults in 62 sites in 20 countries. Eligible patients had active ankylosing spondylitis, fulfilled modified New York criteria, were previously untreated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and had inadequate response to at least two or intolerance or contraindication to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 using interactive response technology to take oral upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or oral placebo for the 14-week period 1; only period 1 data are reported here. The primary endpoint was the composite outcome measure of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 response at week 14. Analyses were done in the full analysis set of patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03178487. FINDINGS Between Nov 30, 2017, and Oct 15, 2018, 187 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 15 mg (93 patients) or to placebo (94 patients), and 178 (95%) patients (89 in the upadacitinib group and 89 in the placebo group) completed period 1 on study drug (by the completion date of Jan 21, 2019). Significantly more patients had an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 response in the upadacitinib group versus in the placebo group at week 14 (48 [52%] of 93 patients vs 24 [26%] of 94 patients; p=0·0003; treatment difference 26% [95% CI 13-40]). Adverse events were reported in 58 (62%) of 93 patients in the upadacitinib group versus 52 (55%) of 94 in the placebo group. The most common adverse event in the upadacitinib group was increased creatine phosphokinase (eight [9%] of 93 patients in the upadacitinib group vs two [2%] of 94 patients with placebo). No serious infections, herpes zoster, malignancy, venous thromboembolic events, or deaths were reported; one serious adverse event was reported in each group. INTERPRETATION Upadacitinib 15 mg was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis who had an inadequate response or contraindication to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These data support the further investigation of upadacitinib for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis. FUNDING AbbVie.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Comparison Procedures
(2013) · An Introduction to Statistical Concepts · doi:10.4324/9780203137819-17 · Cited by 2,109
2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis
van der Heijde, D., Ramiro, S., Landewé, R., Baraliakos, X., Van den Bosch, F., Sepriano, A., Regel, A., Ciurea, A., Dagfinrud, H., Dougados, M., et al. (2017) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210770 · Cited by 1,568
Self-citationSieper, J., & Poddubnyy, D. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31591-4 · Cited by 1,333
Self-citationDougados, M., & Baeten, D. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60071-8 · Cited by 780
Ward, M. M., Deodhar, A., Gensler, L. S., Dubreuil, M., Yu, D., Khan, M. A., Haroon, N., Borenstein, D., Wang, R., Biehl, A., et al. (2019) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.24025 · Cited by 693
Self-citationSmolen, J. S., Schöls, M., Braun, J., Dougados, M., FitzGerald, O., Gladman, D. D., Kavanaugh, A., Landewé, R., Mease, P., Sieper, J., et al. (2018) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211734 · Cited by 682
Self-citationMaksymowych, W. P., Inman, R. D., Salonen, D., Dhillon, S. S., Williams, M., Stone, M., Conner‐spady, B., Palsat, J., & Lambert, R. G. W. (2005) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.21445 · Cited by 531
Self-citationLandewé, R., Braun, J., Deodhar, A. A., Dougados, M., Maksymowych, W. P., Mease, P. J., Reveille, J. D., Rudwaleit, M., van der Heijde, D. M. F. M., Stach, C. M., et al. (2013) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204231 · Cited by 470
Self-citationFleischmann, R., Pangan, A. L., Song, I., Mysler, E., Bessette, L., Peterfy, C., Durez, P., Ostor, A. J., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., et al. (2019) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.41032 · Cited by 444
Self-citationGenovese, M. C., Fleischmann, R., Combe, B., Hall, S., Rubbert-Roth, A., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Mohamed, M.-E. F., Meerwein, S., & Pangan, A. L. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31116-4 · Cited by 422
Self-citation
Cited by
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic
Hu, X., li, J., Fu, M., Zhao, X., & Wang, W. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1 · Cited by 2,633
ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update
Ramiro, S., Nikiphorou, E., Sepriano, A., Ortolan, A., Webers, C., Baraliakos, X., Landewé, R. B. M., Van den Bosch, F. E., Boteva, B., Bremander, A., et al. (2023) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard-2022-223296 · Cited by 992
Self-citationJanus kinase-targeting therapies in rheumatology: A mechanisms-based approach
Tanaka, Y., Luo, Y., O’Shea, J. J., & Nakayamada, S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-021-00726-8 · Cited by 501
Nash, P., Kerschbaumer, A., Dörner, T., Dougados, M., Fleischmann, R. M., Geissler, K., McInnes, I., Pope, J. E., van der Heijde, D., Stoffer-Marx, M., et al. (2021) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218398 · Cited by 299
Self-citationDeodhar, A., Sliwinska-Stanczyk, P., Xu, H., Baraliakos, X., Gensler, L. S., Fleishaker, D., Wang, L., Wu, J., Menon, S., Wang, C., et al. (2021) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219601 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Heijde, D., Song, I.-H., Pangan, A. L., Deodhar, A., van den Bosch, F., Maksymowych, W. P., Kim, T.-H., Kishimoto, M., Everding, A., Sui, Y., Wang, X., Chu, A. D., & Sieper, J.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 394
- Issue
- 10214
- Pages
- 2108-2117
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2988532979
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 26.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (SELECT-AXIS 1): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32534-6
- The paper
- van der Heijde, D., Song, I.-H., Pangan, A. L., Deodhar, A., van den Bosch, F., Maksymowych, W. P., Kim, T.-H., Kishimoto, M., Everding, A., Sui, Y., Wang, X., Chu, A. D., & Sieper, J. (2019). Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (SELECT-AXIS 1): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32534-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.