The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.
Improving the prognosis of health care in the USA
Open accessAbstract
Although health care expenditure per capita is higher in the USA than in any other country, more than 37 million Americans do not have health insurance, and 41 million more have inadequate access to care. Efforts are ongoing to repeal the Affordable Care Act which would exacerbate health-care inequities. By contrast, a universal system, such as that proposed in the Medicare for All Act, has the potential to transform the availability and efficiency of American health-care services. Taking into account both the costs of coverage expansion and the savings that would be achieved through the Medicare for All Act, we calculate that a single-payer, universal health-care system is likely to lead to a 13% savings in national health-care expenditure, equivalent to more than US$450 billion annually (based on the value of the US$ in 2017). The entire system could be funded with less financial outlay than is incurred by employers and households paying for health-care premiums combined with existing government allocations. This shift to single-payer health care would provide the greatest relief to lower-income households. Furthermore, we estimate that ensuring health-care access for all Americans would save more than 68 000 lives and 1·73 million life-years every year compared with the status quo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“yet it remains one of the most inequitable areas within healthcare (3, 4)”
From Access to oral health care and its social determinants across the lifespan in the United States (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012)
Authors/Task Force Members:, Perk, J., De Backer, G., Gohlke, H., Graham, I., Reiner, Ž., Verschuren, M., Albus, C., Benlian, P., Boysen, G., et al. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092 · Cited by 8,490
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2002
American Diabetes Association (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.3.917 · Cited by 4,147
European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary
Graham, I., Atar, D., Borch‐Johnsen, K., Boysen, G., Burell, G. K., Cífková, R., Dallongeville, J., Backer, G. D., Ebrahim, S. B. J., Gjelsvik, B., et al. (2007) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm316 · Cited by 3,865
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2012
American Diabetes Association (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-2625 · Cited by 2,227
The Prescription Opioid and Heroin Crisis: A Public Health Approach to an Epidemic of Addiction
Kolodny, A., Courtwright, D. T., Hwang, C. S., Kreiner, P., Eadie, J. L., Clark, T. W., & Alexander, G. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122957 · Cited by 1,388
Kassebaum, N. J., Barber, R. M., Bhutta, Z. A., Dandona, L., Gething, P. W., Hay, S. I., Kinfu, Y., Larson, H. J., Liang, X., Lim, S. S., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31470-2 · Cited by 1,210
Textbook, M. (2017) · Cited by 820
Barber, R. M., Fullman, N., Sorensen, R. J. D., Bollyky, T., McKee, M., Nolte, E., Abajobir, A. A., Abate, K. H., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30818-8 · Cited by 764
Geck, C. E. (2017) · The Charleston Advisor · doi:10.5260/chara.19.1.58 · Cited by 681
The World almanac and book of facts, 2010
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-4753 · Cited by 659
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice
Karalis, V. D. (2024) · Applied Biosciences · doi:10.3390/applbiosci3010002 · Cited by 255
“Insurers may need to adapt their underwriting processes to account for the specific risks posed by AI in healthcare [189].”
BackgroundThe Green New Deal in the United States: What it is and how to pay for it
Galvin, R., & Healy, N. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101529 · Cited by 188
“We note, however, that a new, very robust study of US healthcare concludes that Medicare for All would save the US economy $450 billion per year [60].”
InfluentialPublic policy and health in the Trump era
Woolhandler, S. J., Himmelstein, D. U., Ahmed, S., Bailey, Z., Bassett, M. T., Bird, M. E., Bor, J. H., Bor, D. H., Carrasquillo, O., Chowkwanyun, M., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32545-9 · Cited by 172
Update on Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci—What the Clinician Should Know
Michels, R., Last, K., Becker, S. L., & Papan, C. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9040830 · Cited by 166
“, blood cultures or otherwise primarily sterile samples, in parallel to the advancement in all medical specialties [10].”
BackgroundBenavidez, G. A., Zgodic, A., Zahnd, W. E., & Eberth, J. M. (2021) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd18.200315 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Foster, E. M., Singer, B. H., & Fitzpatrick, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- Galvani, Alison P
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 395
- Issue
- 10223
- Pages
- 524-533
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- PMC
- PMC8572548
- OpenAlex
- W3006668752
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K01AI141576)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Practices
- Keywords
- single-payer health care, Medicare for All, universal health care, health care expenditure, Affordable Care Act repeal, health insurance coverage, health care access, health care inequities, cost reduction, life-years gained, health policy, United States
- MeSH terms
- Universal Health Care, Delivery of Health Care, Health Expenditures, Medicare, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Prognosis, United States, Drug Costs, Cost Savings, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
