Cited by 11,907SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections StudiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding

Open access
Lu, Roujian, Zhao, Xiang, Li, Juan, Niu, Peihua, Yang, Bo, Wu, Honglong, Wang, Wenling, Song, Hao +27 more·2020·The Lancet

Abstract

Background In late December, 2019, patients presenting with viral pneumonia due to an unidentified microbial agent were reported in Wuhan, China. A novel coronavirus was subsequently identified as the causative pathogen, provisionally named 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). As of Jan 26, 2020, more than 2000 cases of 2019-nCoV infection have been confirmed, most of which involved people living in or visiting Wuhan, and human-to-human transmission has been confirmed.Methods We did next-generation sequencing of samples from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and cultured isolates from nine inpatients, eight of whom had visited the Huanan seafood market in Wuhan. Complete and partial 2019-nCoV genome sequences were obtained from these individuals. Viral contigs were connected using Sanger sequencing to obtain the full-length genomes, with the terminal regions determined by rapid amplification of cDNA ends. Phylogenetic analysis of these 2019-nCoV genomes and those of other coronaviruses was used to determine the evolutionary history of the virus and help infer its likely origin. Homology modelling was done to explore the likely receptor-binding properties of the virus.Findings The ten genome sequences of 2019-nCoV obtained from the nine patients were extremely similar, exhibiting more than 99·98% sequence identity. Notably, 2019-nCoV was closely related (with 88% identity) to two bat-derived severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like coronaviruses, bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21, collected in 2018 in Zhoushan, eastern China, but were more distant from SARS-CoV (about 79%) and MERS-CoV (about 50%). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 2019-nCoV fell within the subgenus Sarbecovirus of the genus Betacoronavirus, with a relatively long branch length to its closest relatives bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21, and was genetically distinct from SARS-CoV. Notably, homology modelling revealed that 2019-nCoV had a similar receptor-binding domain structure to that of SARS-CoV, despite amino acid variation at some key residues.Interpretation 2019-nCoV is sufficiently divergent from SARS-CoV to be considered a new human-infecting betacoronavirus. Although our phylogenetic analysis suggests that bats might be the original host of this virus, an animal sold at the seafood market in Wuhan might represent an intermediate host facilitating the emergence of the virus in humans. Importantly, structural analysis suggests that 2019-nCoV might be able to bind to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor in humans. The future evolution, adaptation, and spread of this virus warrant urgent investigation.Funding National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Major Project for Control and Prevention of Infectious Disease in China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shandong First Medical University.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30251-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The trimeric S protein on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 plays a key role in mediating host cell invasion.

    “The trimeric S protein on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 plays a key role in mediating host cell invasion.”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [229]

  • The S protein is considered the main antigen for vaccine design.

    “Therefore, the S protein is considered the main antigen for vaccine design.228–230”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [229]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 11,907

Authors
Lu, R., Zhao, X., Li, J., Niu, P., Yang, B., Wu, H., Wang, W., Song, H., Huang, B., Zhu, N., Bi, Y., Ma, X., Zhan, F., Wang, L., Hu, T., Zhou, H., Hu, Z., Zhou, W., Zhao, L., Chen, J., Meng, Y., Wang, J., Lin, Y., Yuan, J., Xie, Z., Ma, J., Liu, W. J., Wang, D., Xu, W., Holmes, E. C., Gao, G. F., Wu, G., Chen, W., Shi, W., & Tan, W.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • Shandong First Medical University (CN)
  • Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • BGI Group (China) (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • General Hospital of Central Theater Command (CN)
  • Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Shandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Shi, Weifeng
  • Tan, Wenjie
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
395
Issue
10224
Pages
565-574
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3004318991
Cited by
11,907
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 307 · 2024: 601 · 2023: 1057 · 2022: 1711 · 2021: 3330 · 2020: 4743 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
354.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Programme of China (2016YFD0500301, 2020YFC0840800, 2020YFC0840900)
  • National Major Project for Control and Prevention of Infectious Disease in China (2017ZX10104001, 2018ZX10101002, 2018ZX10101004, 2018ZX10732-401)
  • State Key Research Development Program of China (2019YFC1200501)
  • Strategic Priority Research Programme of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB29010102)
  • Academic Promotion Programme of Shandong First Medical University (2019QL006, 2019PT008)
  • Taishan Scholars Programme of Shandong Province (ts201511056)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, novel coronavirus, viral genome sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, receptor binding domain, ACE2 receptor, human-to-human transmission, Huanan Seafood Market, viral origin
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid, China, Disease Reservoirs, DNA, Viral, Humans, Phylogeny, Pneumonia, Viral, Receptors, Virus, Sequence Alignment, Genome, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review