Cited by 350COVID-19 epidemiological studiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchInfection Control and Ventilation

Secondary attack rate and superspreading events for SARS-CoV-2

Open access
Liu, Yang, Eggo, Rosalind M, Kucharski, Adam J·2020·The Lancet

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30462-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Super-spreading events and sustained person-to-person transmission have not been reported previously in outbreaks of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome but have been observed in disease outbreaks caused by Ebola virus, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2.

    “Super-spreading events and sustained person-to-person transmission have not been reported previously in outbreaks of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome but have been observed in disease outbreaks caused by Ebola virus, 25 Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2.26,27”

    From "Super-Spreaders" and Person-to-Person Transmission of Andes Virus in Argentina (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 350

Authors
Liu, Y., Eggo, R. M., & Kucharski, A. J.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Kucharski, Adam J
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
395
Issue
10227
Pages
e47
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3008721669
Cited by
350
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 137
FWCI
12.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (206250/Z/17/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/S003975/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, secondary attack rate, superspreading events, basic reproduction number, household transmission, close contacts, social interaction, transmission risk, COVID-19 outbreak
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Disease Outbreaks, Family Characteristics, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Risk, Contact Tracing, Coronavirus Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review