CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 232Child Abuse and TraumaHealth disparities and outcomesChild Welfare and Adoption

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trajectories of childhood adversity and mortality in early adulthood: a population-based cohort study

Rod, Naja H, Bengtsson, Jessica, Budtz-Jørgensen, Esben, Clipet-Jensen, Clara, Taylor-Robinson, David, Andersen, Anne-Marie Nybo, Dich, Nadya, Rieckmann, Andreas·2020·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30621-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Childhood is a sensitive period with rapid brain development and physiological growth, and adverse events in childhood might interfere with these processes and have long-lasting effects on health. In this study, we aimed to describe trajectories of adverse childhood experiences and relate these to overall and cause-specific mortality in early adult life.Methods For this population-based cohort study, we used unselected annually updated data from Danish nationwide registers covering more than 1 million children born between 1980 and 1998. We distinguished between three different dimensions of childhood adversities: poverty and material deprivation, loss or threat of loss within the family, and aspects of family dynamics such as maternal separation. We used a group-based multi-trajectory clustering model to define the different trajectories of children aged between 0 and 16 years. We assessed the associations between these trajectories and mortality rates between 16 and 34 years of age using a Cox proportional hazards model and an Aalen hazards difference model.Findings Between Jan 1, 1980 and Dec 31, 2015, 2 223 927 children were included in the Danish Life Course cohort. We excluded 1 064 864 children born after 1998, 50 274 children who emigrated before their 16th birthday, and 11 161 children who died before their 16th birthday, resulting in a final sample of 1 097 628 children. We identified five distinct trajectories of childhood adversities. Compared with children with a low adversity trajectory, those who had early-life material deprivation (hazard ratio 1·38, 95% CI 1·27-1·51), persistent deprivation (1·77, 1·62-1·93), or loss or threat of loss (1·80, 1·61-2·00) had a moderately higher risk of premature mortality. A small proportion of children (36 081 [3%]) had multiple adversities within all dimensions and throughout the entire childhood. This group had a 4·54 times higher all-cause mortality risk (95% CI 4·07-5·06) than that of children with a low adversity trajectory, corresponding to 10·30 (95% CI 9·03-11·60) additional deaths per 10 000 person-years. Accidents, suicides, and cancer were the most common causes of death in this high adversity population.Interpretation Almost half of Danish children in our study experienced some degree of adversity, and this was associated with a moderately higher risk of mortality in adulthood. Among these, a small group of children had multiple adversities across social, health, and family-related dimensions. This group had a markedly higher mortality risk in early adulthood than that of other children, which requires public health attention.Funding None.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30621-8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bengtsson, 2019, Cohort profile: the DANish LIFE course (DANLIFE) cohort, BMJ Open, 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 232

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rod, N. H., Bengtsson, J., Budtz-Jørgensen, E., Clipet-Jensen, C., Taylor-Robinson, D., Andersen, A.-M. N., Dich, N., & Rieckmann, A.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Rod, Naja H
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
396
Issue
10249
Pages
489-497
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30621-8
OpenAlex
W3048611576
Cited by
232
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 4
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/P008577/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
childhood adversity, adverse childhood experiences, mortality trajectories, material deprivation, poverty, family loss, maternal separation, family dynamics, premature mortality, cause-specific mortality, accidents, suicide, cancer, life course epidemiology, developmental origins of health and disease, family breakdown, Denmark
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cause of Death, Denmark, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Male, Maternal Deprivation, Mortality, Poverty, Registries, Proportional Hazards Models, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review