Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 525

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Retinal findings in patients with COVID-19

Open access
Marinho, Paula M, Marcos, Allexya A A, Romano, André C, Nascimento, Heloisa, Belfort, Rubens·2020·The Lancet

Abstract

C o r o n a v i r u s d i s e a s e 2 0 1 9 (COVID-19) has been shown to affect different parts of the body, and ophthalmological changes have been associated with ocular external diseases such as conjuntivitis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that is useful for demonstrating subclinical retinal changes in systemic conditions such as diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease, as well as many viral infections. We used OCT to evaluate patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The protocol was approved by INVIRARE Pesquisa Clínica Auditoria e Consultoria Institutional Review Board Ethics Committee. Here we report retinal and OCT changes in 12 adults (six men and six women, aged 25–69 years), examined 11–33 days after COVID-19 symptom onset. All patients had fever, asthenia, and dyspnoea, and 11 patients also presented with anosmia. Two patients were admitted to hospital but none required intensive care. Nine patients were physicians, and two were health-care workers. All patients had normal blood param eters at the time of ophthalmological evaluation. Nine patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR (using nasal and oral swabs), and two patients tested positive in antibody tests for COVID-19. Two different OCT devices were used: DRI-OCT Triton Swept Source (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) and XR Avanti SD-OCT (Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA). All patients showed hyper-reflective lesions at the level of ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers more prominently at the papillomacular bundle in both eyes (figure). Results of OCT-angiography and ganglionar cells complex analysis appeared normal. Furthermore, four patients presented subtle cotton wool spots and microhaemorrhages along the retinal arcade, observed on fundus examination, color fundus photography, and red-free imaging. Visual acuity and pupillary reflexes were normal in all eyes, and we detected no symptoms or signs of intraocular inflammation. Although animal models suggest ocular lesions could include retinitis and optic neuritis, this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first report of retinal findings possibly associated with COVID-19 infection in humans. Ganglion cell and plexiform layer findings could be associated with CNS manifestations that have been described in animal studies and in COVID-19 neurological events.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31014-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 525

Metadata

Authors
Marinho, P. M., Marcos, A. A. A., Romano, A. C., Nascimento, H., & Belfort, R.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
395
Issue
10237
Pages
1610
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3025803855
Cited by
525
References
1
FWCI
76.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retinal findings in patients with COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31014-x
The paper
Marinho, P. M., Marcos, A. A. A., Romano, A. C., Nascimento, H., & Belfort, R. (2020). Retinal findings in patients with COVID-19. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31014-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.