Cited by 392Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchBone health and treatments

Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

Moreau, Philippe, Dimopoulos, Meletios-Athanasios, Mikhael, Joseph, Yong, Kwee, Capra, Marcelo, Facon, Thierry, Hajek, Roman, Špička, Ivan +84 more·2021·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Isatuximab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved in combination with pomalidomide-dexamethasone and carfilzomib-dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. This phase 3, open-label study compared the efficacy of isatuximab plus carfilzomib-dexamethasone versus carfilzomib-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Methods This was a prospective, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 study done at 69 study centres in 16 countries across North America, South America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma aged at least 18 years who had received one to three previous lines of therapy and had measurable serum or urine M-protein were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (3:2) to isatuximab plus carfilzomib-dexamethasone (isatuximab group) or carfilzomib-dexamethasone (control group). Patients in the isatuximab group received isatuximab 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for the first 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks. Both groups received the approved schedule of intravenous carfilzomib and oral or intravenous dexamethasone. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and was assessed in the intention-to-treat population according to assigned treatment. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose according to treatment received. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03275285…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00592-4

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The populations in the trials of the two triplet regimens differed from the CARTITUDE-4 trial population, and lenalidomide resistance was not a criterion for inclusion in those trials.

    “However, the populations in these trials differed from our trial population, and lenalidomide resistance was not a criterion for inclusion.”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreau, P., Dimopoulos, M.-A., Mikhael, J., Yong, K., Capra, M., Facon, T., Hajek, R., Špička, I., Baker, R., Kim, K., Martinez, G., Min, C.-K., Pour, L., Leleu, X., Oriol, A., Koh, Y., Suzuki, K., Risse, M.-L., Asset, G., Macé, S., Martin, T., Moreau, P., Dimopoulos, M.-A., Mikhael, J., Yong, K., Capra, M., Facon, T., Hajek, R., Spicka, I., Baker, R., Kihyun, K., Martinez, G., Chang-Ki, M., Pour, L., Leleu, X., Oriol, A., Youngil, K., Suzuki, K., Martin, T., Quach, H., Lim, A., Crowther, H., Sia, H., Hulin, C., Mohty, M., Mikala, G., Nagy, Z., Reinoso Segura, M., Rosinol, L., Yagci, M., Turgut, M., Garg, M., Parmar, G., Augustson, B., Castro, N., Crusoe, E., Pika, T., Delimpasi, S., Ishizawa, K., George, A., Konstantinova, T., De La Rubia, J., Sung-Hyun, K., Maiolino, A., Reiman, A., LeBlanc, R., Ito, S., Tanaka, J., Luchinin, A., Kryuchkova, I., Martinez, J., Shustik, J., Karlin, L., Symeonidis, A., Egyed, M., Petrini, M., Cavo, M., Uchiyama, M., Blacklock, H., Arat, M., Griffin, J., Hunter, H., Buck, T., Anagnostopoulos, A., Konstantopoulos, K., Masszi, T., Bringhen, S., Gamberi, B., Kawano, Y., Jin Seok, K., Ozdogu, H., & Ozkalemkas, F.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Sanofi (France) (FR)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Japanese Red Cross Medical Center (JP)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
397
Issue
10292
Pages
2361-2371
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3170038569
Cited by
392
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 25
FWCI
45.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Sanofi Genzyme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
isatuximab, carfilzomib, dexamethasone, relapsed multiple myeloma, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, progression-free survival, combination therapy, treatment safety, M protein, proteasome inhibitors, immunotherapy, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, adverse events
MeSH terms
Progression-Free Survival, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Dexamethasone, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Immunologic Factors, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Oligopeptides, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Thalidomide, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Administration, Intravenous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review