The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the chimpanzee adenovirus type 3-vectored Marburg virus (cAd3-Marburg) vaccine in healthy adults in the USA: a first-in-human, phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation trial
Open accessAbstract
Background WHO has identified Marburg virus as an emerging virus requiring urgent vaccine research and development, particularly due to its recent emergence in Ghana. We report results from a first-in-human clinical trial evaluating a replication-deficient recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus type 3 (cAd3)-vectored vaccine encoding a wild-type Marburg virus Angola glycoprotein (cAd3-Marburg) in healthy adults. Methods We did a first-in-human, phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation trial of the cAd3-Marburg vaccine at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Clinical Trials Center in the USA. Healthy adults aged 18-50 years were assigned to receive a single intramuscular dose of cAd3-Marburg vaccine at either 1 × 10 10 or 1 × 10 11 particle units (pu). Primary safety endpoints included reactogenicity assessed for the first 7 days and all adverse events assessed for 28 days after vaccination. Secondary immunogenicity endpoints were assessment of binding antibody responses and T-cell responses against the Marburg virus glycoprotein insert, and assessment of neutralising antibody responses against the cAd3 vector 4 weeks after vaccination. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03475056. Findings Between Oct 9, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, 40 healthy adults were enrolled and assigned to receive a single intramuscular dose of cAd3-Marburg vaccine at either 1 × 10 10 pu (n=20) or 1 × 10 11 pu (n=20). The cAd3-Marburg vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic. All enrolled participants received cAd3-Marburg vaccine, with 37 (93%) participants completing follow-up visits; two (5%) participants moved from the area and one (3%) was lost to follow-up. No serious adverse events related to vaccination occurred. Mild to moderate reactogenicity was observed after vaccination, with symptoms of injection site pain and tenderness (27 [68%] of 40 participants), malaise (18 [45%] of 40 participants), headache (17 [43%] of 40 participants), and myalgia (14 [35%] of 40 participants) most commonly reported. Glycoprotein-specific antibodies were induced in 38 (95%) of 40 participants 4 weeks after vaccination, with geometric mean titres of 421 [95% CI 209-846] in the 1 × 10 10 pu group and 545 [276-1078] in the 1 × 10 11 pu group, and remained significantly elevated at 48 weeks compared with baseline titres (39 [95% CI 13-119] in the 1 ×10 10 pu group and 27 [95-156] in the 1 ×10 11 pu group; both p<0·0001). T-cell responses to the glycoprotein insert and neutralising responses against the cAd3 vector were also increased at 4 weeks after vaccination. Interpretation This first-in-human trial of this cAd3-Marburg vaccine showed the agent is safe and immunogenic, with a safety profile similar to previously tested cAd3-vectored filovirus vaccines. 95% of participants produced a glycoprotein-specific antibody response at 4 weeks after a single vaccination, which remained in 70% of participants at 48 weeks. These findings represent a crucial step in the development of a vaccine for emergency deployment against a re-emerging pathogen that has recently expanded its reach to new regions. Funding National Institutes of Health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A monovalent chimpanzee adenovirus Ebola vaccine boosted with MVA
Ewer, K., Rampling, T., Venkatraman, N., Bowyer, G., Wright, D., Lambe, T., Imoukhuede, E. B., Payne, R., Fehling, S. K., Strecker, T., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1411627 · Cited by 348
Self-citationMarburg Hemorrhagic Fever Associated with Multiple Genetic Lineages of Virus
Bausch, D. G., Nichol, S. T., Muyembe-Tamfum, J. J., Borchert, M., Rollin, P. E., Sleurs, H., Campbell, P., Tshioko, F. K., Roth, C., Colebunders, R., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa051465 · Cited by 307
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Mehand, 2018, The WHO R&D Blueprint: 2018 review of emerging infectious diseases requiring urgent research and development efforts, Antiviral Res, 159, 63, 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.09.009 · DOI
- Pigott, 2015, Mapping the zoonotic niche of Marburg virus disease in Africa, Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 109, 366, 10.1093/trstmh/trv024 · DOI
- Pigott, 2014, Mapping the zoonotic niche of Ebola virus disease in Africa, eLife, 3, 10.7554/eLife.04395 · DOI
- Towner, 2006, Marburgvirus genomics and association with a large hemorrhagic fever outbreak in Angola, J Virol, 80, 6497, 10.1128/JVI.00069-06 · DOI
- Burk, 2016, Neglected filoviruses, FEMS Microbiol Rev, 40, 494, 10.1093/femsre/fuw010 · DOI
- Reynolds, 2017, Ebola and Marburg virus vaccines, Virus Genes, 53, 501, 10.1007/s11262-017-1455-x · DOI
- Manicassamy, 2007, Characterization of Marburg virus glycoprotein in viral entry, Virology, 358, 79, 10.1016/j.virol.2006.06.041 · DOI
- Swenson, 2005, Virus-like particles exhibit potential as a pan-filovirus vaccine for both Ebola and Marburg viral infections, Vaccine, 23, 3033, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.070 · DOI
- Hunegnaw, 2022, A single-shot ChAd3-MARV vaccine confers rapid and durable protection against Marburg virus in nonhuman primates, Sci Transl Med, 14, 10.1126/scitranslmed.abq6364 · DOI
- Dulin, 2021, Systematic review of Marburg virus vaccine nonhuman primate studies and human clinical trials, Vaccine, 39, 202, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.042 · DOI
- Sullivan, 2000, Development of a preventive vaccine for Ebola virus infection in primates, Nature, 408, 605, 10.1038/35046108 · DOI
- Sullivan, 2003, Accelerated vaccination for Ebola virus haemorrhagic fever in non-human primates, Nature, 424, 681, 10.1038/nature01876 · DOI
- Callendret, 2018, A prophylactic multivalent vaccine against different filovirus species is immunogenic and provides protection from lethal infections with Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus species in non-human primates, PLoS One, 13
- Swenson, 2008, Vaccine to confer to nonhuman primates complete protection against multistrain Ebola and Marburg virus infections, Clin Vaccine Immunol, 15, 460, 10.1128/CVI.00431-07 · DOI
- Colloca, 2012, Vaccine vectors derived from a large collection of simian adenoviruses induce potent cellular immunity across multiple species, Sci Transl Med, 4, 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002925 · DOI
- Quinn, 2013, Comparative analysis of the magnitude, quality, phenotype, and protective capacity of simian immunodeficiency virus gag-specific CD8+ T cells following human-, simian-, and chimpanzee-derived recombinant adenoviral vector immunization, J Immunol, 190, 2720, 10.4049/jimmunol.1202861 · DOI
- Stanley, 2014, Chimpanzee adenovirus vaccine generates acute and durable protective immunity against ebolavirus challenge, Nat Med, 20, 1126, 10.1038/nm.3702 · DOI
- Peruzzi, 2009, A novel chimpanzee serotype-based adenoviral vector as delivery tool for cancer vaccines, Vaccine, 27, 1293, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.12.051 · DOI
- Tapia, 2020, Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a chimpanzee adenovirus vectored Ebola vaccine in adults in Africa: a randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, Lancet Infect Dis, 20, 707, 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30016-5 · DOI
- Ledgerwood, 2017, Chimpanzee adenovirus vector Ebola vaccine, N Engl J Med, 376, 928, 10.1056/NEJMoa1410863 · DOI
- De Santis, 2016, Safety and immunogenicity of a chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored Ebola vaccine in healthy adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 1/2a study, Lancet Infect Dis, 16, 311, 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00486-7 · DOI
- Venkatraman, 2019, Safety and Immunogenicity of a heterologous prime-boost Ebola virus vaccine regimen in healthy adults in the United Kingdom and Senegal, J Infect Dis, 219, 1187, 10.1093/infdis/jiy639 · DOI
- Tapia, 2020, Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a chimpanzee adenovirus vectored Ebola vaccine in children in Africa: a randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, Lancet Infect Dis, 20, 719, 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30019-0 · DOI
- Kennedy, 2017, Phase 2 placebo-controlled trial of two vaccines to prevent Ebola in Liberia, N Engl J Med, 377, 1438, 10.1056/NEJMoa1614067 · DOI
- Sarwar, 2015, Safety and immunogenicity of DNA vaccines encoding Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus wild-type glycoproteins in a phase I clinical trial, J Infect Dis, 211, 549, 10.1093/infdis/jiu511 · DOI
- Swanson, 2021, AZD1222/ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination induces a polyfunctional spike protein-specific TH1 response with a diverse TCR repertoire, Sci Transl Med, 13, 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj7211 · DOI
- Monaco, 2016, flowAI: automatic and interactive anomaly discerning tools for flow cytometry data, Bioinformatics, 32, 2473, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw191 · DOI
- Kibuuka, 2015, Safety and immunogenicity of Ebola virus and Marburg virus glycoprotein DNA vaccines assessed separately and concomitantly in healthy Ugandan adults: a phase 1b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, Lancet, 385, 1545, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62385-0 · DOI
- Ledgerwood, 2010, A replication defective recombinant Ad5 vaccine expressing Ebola virus GP is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults, Vaccine, 29, 304, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.037 · DOI
- Zhu, 2015, Safety and immunogenicity of a novel recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based Ebola vaccine in healthy adults in China: preliminary report of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial, Lancet, 385, 2272, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60553-0 · DOI
- Folegatti, 2020, Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus viral-vectored vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, uncontrolled, phase 1 trial, Lancet Infect Dis, 20, 816, 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30160-2 · DOI
- Barnes, 2012, Novel adenovirus-based vaccines induce broad and sustained T cell responses to HCV in man, Sci Transl Med, 4, 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003155 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marburg virus disease outbreaks, mathematical models, and disease parameters: a systematic review
Cuomo-Dannenburg, G., McCain, K., McCabe, R., Unwin, H. J. T., Doohan, P., Nash, R. K., Hicks, J. T., Charniga, K., Geismar, C., Lambert, B., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(23)00515-7 · Cited by 65
“Although there is no vaccine approved for MVD, phase 1 clinical trials have shown promising results (62).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamer, M. J., Houser, K. V., Hofstetter, A. R., Ortega-Villa, A. M., Lee, C., Preston, A., Augustine, B., Andrews, C., Yamshchikov, G. V., Hickman, S., Schech, S., Hutter, J. N., Scott, P. T., Waterman, P. E., Amare, M. F., Kioko, V., Storme, C., Modjarrad, K., McCauley, M. D., Robb, M. L., Gaudinski, M. R., Gordon, I. J., Holman, L. A., Widge, A. T., Strom, L., Happe, M., Cox, J. H., Vazquez, S., Stanley, D. A., Murray, T., Dulan, C. N. M., Hunegnaw, R., Narpala, S. R., Swanson, P. A., Basappa, M., Thillainathan, J., Padilla, M., Flach, B., O’Connell, S., Trofymenko, O., Morgan, P., Coates, E. E., Gall, J. G., McDermott, A. B., Koup, R. A., Mascola, J. R., Ploquin, A., Sullivan, N. J., Ake, J. A., Ledgerwood, J. E., Lampley, R., Larkin, B., Costner, P., Wilson, H., & Read, M.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Houser, Katherine V
- ORCID
- Hamer, Melinda J
- Houser, Katherine V
- Hofstetter, Amelia R
- Lee, Christine
- Augustine, Brooke
- Hutter, Jack N
- Scott, Paul T
- Waterman, Paige E
- Amare, Mihret F
- Modjarrad, Kayvon
- Robb, Merlin L
- Gaudinski, Martin R
- Gordon, Ingelise J
- Holman, LaSonji A
- Widge, Alicia T
- Happe, Myra
- Cox, Josephine H
- Vazquez, Sandra
- Stanley, Daphne A
- Murray, Tamar
- Dulan, Caitlyn N M
- Hunegnaw, Ruth
- Narpala, Sandeep R
- Swanson, Phillip A
- O’Connell, Sarah
- Coates, Emily E
- Gall, Jason G
- McDermott, Adrian B
- Koup, Richard A
- Mascola, John R
- Ploquin, Aurélie
- Sullivan, Nancy J
- Ake, Julie A
- Ledgerwood, Julie E
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 401
- Issue
- 10373
- Pages
- 294-302
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- PMC
- PMC10127441
- OpenAlex
- W4318159245
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14
- FWCI
- 14.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Poxvirus research and outbreaks
- Keywords
- vaccine safety, vaccine immunogenicity, reactogenicity, neutralizing antibodies, T cell response, dose escalation, emerging viruses, dose-limiting toxicity, healthy adults, vaccine storage and transport
- MeSH terms
- Adenoviridae, Adenoviruses, Simian, Adult, Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Pan troglodytes, Double-Blind Method, Glycoproteins, Humans, Vaccines, Synthetic, Marburgvirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review