Cited by 220Antibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaInfection Control in Healthcare

Burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in low-income and middle-income countries avertible by existing interventions: an evidence review and modelling analysis

Lewnard, Joseph A, Charani, Esmita, Gleason, Alec, Hsu, Li Yang, Khan, Wasif Ali, Karkey, Abhilasha, Chandler, Clare I R, Mashe, Tapfumanei +4 more·2024·The Lancet

Abstract

National action plans enumerate many interventions as potential strategies to reduce the burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, knowledge of the benefits achievable by specific approaches is needed to inform policy making, especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) with substantial AMR burden and low health-care system capacity. In a modelling analysis, we estimated that improving infection prevention and control programmes in LMIC health-care settings could prevent at least 337 000 (95% CI 250 200-465 200) AMR-associated deaths annually. Ensuring universal access to high-quality water, sanitation, and hygiene services would prevent 247 800 (160 000-337 800) AMR-associated deaths and paediatric vaccines 181 500 (153 400-206 800) AMR-associated deaths, from both direct prevention of resistant infections and reductions in antibiotic consumption. These estimates translate to prevention of 7·8% (5·6-11·0) of all AMR-associated mortality in LMICs by infection prevention and control, 5·7% (3·7-8·0) by water, sanitation, and hygiene, and 4·2% (3·4-5·1) by vaccination interventions. Despite the continuing need for research and innovation to overcome limitations of existing approaches, our findings indicate that reducing global AMR burden by 10% by the year 2030 is achievable with existing interventions. Our results should guide investments in public health interventions with the greatest potential to reduce AMR burden.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00862-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 155 · Cited by 220

Authors
Lewnard, J. A., Charani, E., Gleason, A., Hsu, L. Y., Khan, W. A., Karkey, A., Chandler, C. I. R., Mashe, T., Khan, E. A., Bulabula, A. N. H., Donado-Godoy, P., & Laxminarayan, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (BD)
  • Patan Academy of Health Sciences (NP)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • World Health Organization - Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (ET)
  • Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria – AGROSAVIA (CO)
Corresponding author
  • Lewnard, Joseph A
  • Laxminarayan, Ramanan
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
403
Issue
10442
Pages
2439-2454
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4398244279
Cited by
220
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 32
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
bacterial antimicrobial resistance, infection control, water, sanitation and hygiene, antibiotic use, low- and middle-income countries, national action plans, healthcare settings
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Infections, Developing Countries, Humans, Hygiene, Sanitation, Drug Resistance, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review