The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NON-OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS AND MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA IN FEMALES
Abstract
A study of the occupational histories of 52 females with malignant mesothelioma and certain of their relatives, carried out to measure the risk of this disorder attributable to indirect asbestos exposure, showed that a significantly greater number of husbands and fathers of cases than of controls worked in asbestos-related industries, and the relative risk for this factor was 10. The frequency of parental cancer, especially gastrointestinal malignancy, was also significantly greater for cases than for their controls. This raises the possibility of a genetic predisposition to malignant mesothelioma.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our review included 14 case-control studies, of which 10 reported relative risk estimates or provided enough information to calculate a crude relative risk estimate [2-5,49-54,56], ranging from 1.4 [54] to 16.75 [2,3].”
From Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Vianna and Polan [4], Spirtas et al. [49], and Welch et al. [53] combine the activity of brake lining work/repair with traditionally highly exposed asbestos activities (e.g., insulation, shipyard work); thus, any observed increase in risk cannot be attributed to automobile mechanic work or solely to chrysotile exposure, and instead is highly likely attributable to the other activities (e.g., [108]”
From Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 1973, Lancet, i, 1115
- Wagner, 1960, Br. J. ind. Med., 17, 260
- Newhouse, 1968, Br. J. ind. Med., 22, 261
- Lillington, 1974, New Engl. J. Med., 291, 583
- Champion, 1971, Am. Rev. resp. Dis., 103, 821
- McDonald, 1970, Cancer, 26, 914, 10.1002/1097-0142(197010)26:4<914::AID-CNCR2820260427>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
- Heller, 1970, Am. J. Roent., 108, 53, 10.2214/ajr.108.1.53 · DOI
- Anderson, 1976, Ann. N.Y.Acad.Sci., 271, 311, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb23127.x · DOI
- Harries, 1972, Ann. occup. Hyg., 11, 135, 10.1093/annhyg/11.2.135 · DOI
- McEwan, 1970, Br. med. J., iv, 575, 10.1136/bmj.4.5735.575 · DOI
- Edge, 1976, J. envir. Res., 11, 244, 10.1016/0013-9351(76)90082-7 · DOI
- Newhouse, 1973, Biological Effects of Asbestos, 203
- Whitwell, 1977, Thorax, 321, 377, 10.1136/thx.32.4.377 · DOI
- Jones, 1976, I.A.R.C. Inserm, 52, 117
- Nicholson, 1976, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 271, 152, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb23104.x · DOI
- McDonald, 1972, Archs envir. Hlth, 28, 61, 10.1080/00039896.1974.10666438 · DOI
- Timbrell, 1972, Powder Technol., 5, 279, 10.1016/0032-5910(72)80032-9 · DOI
- Gross, 1967, Archs envir. Hlth, 15, 343, 10.1080/00039896.1967.10664930 · DOI
- Lynch, 1957, Archs ind. Hlth, 15, 207
- Reeves, 1971, J. Envir. Res., 4, 496, 10.1016/0013-9351(71)90010-7 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multicentric study on malignant pleural mesothelioma and non-occupational exposure to asbestos
Magnani, C., Agudo, A., González, C. A., Andrion, A., Calleja, A., Chellini, E., Dalmasso, P., Escolar, A., Hernandez, S., Ivaldi, C., et al. (2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1161 · Cited by 175
Magnani, C., Dalmasso, P., Biggeri, A., Ivaldi, C., Mirabelli, D., & Terracini, B. (2001) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.01109915 · Cited by 165
Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data
Goswami, E., Craven, V., Dahlstrom, D., Alexander, D., & Mowat, F. (2013) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph10115629 · Cited by 92
Mensi, C., Riboldi, L., De Matteis, S., Bertazzi, P. A., & Consonni, D. (2015) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.016 · Cited by 89
The health impact of nonoccupational exposure to asbestos: what do we know?
Goldberg, M., & Luce, D. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/cej.0b013e32832f9bee · Cited by 85
Reid, A., Heyworth, J., de Klerk, N., & Musk, A. W. (2008) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2007.035782 · Cited by 69
Incidence trends and gender differences in malignant mesothelioma in New South Wales, Australia
Hyland, R. A., Ware, S., Johnson, A. R., & Yates, D. H. (2007) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.1145 · Cited by 59
de Klerk, N., Alfonso, H., Olsen, N., Reid, A., Sleith, J., Palmer, L., Berry, G., & Musk, A. (. (2013) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.27758 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Vianna, N., & Polan, A.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1978-05
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 8073
- Pages
- 1061-1063
- ISSN
- 0140-6736
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
