Cited by 212Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsVirology and Viral DiseasesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

FREQUENCY OF TRUE ADVERSE REACTIONS TO MEASLES-MUMPS-RUBELLA VACCINE

Peltola, Heikki, Heinonen, OlliP.·1986·The Lancet

Abstract

The vast majority of adverse reactions following immunisation of children with live measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine were shown in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in 581 twin pairs to be only temporally but not causally related to the vaccination. The true frequency of side-effects caused by MMR vaccine, estimated from the discordance rates of individual signs and symptoms between MMR vaccinees and their placebo-injected twins, was between 0.5 and 4.0%. Moreover, respiratory symptoms, nausea, and vomiting were observed more frequently in the placebo-injected group than in the MMR vaccinated group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91044-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Out of the five RCTs and one CCT assessing short-term side effects, only two studies (Lerman 1981; Peltola 1986) had adequate concealment.

    “Out of the five RCTs and one CCT assessing short-term side effects, only two studies (Lerman 1981; Peltola 1986) had adequate concealment.”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Peltola 1986

  • In Peltola 1986, a trial in twins reported a possible protective effect of MMR vaccine with lower incidence of respiratory symptoms, nausea and vomiting, and no difference in other unintended side effects compared with placebo, except irritability.

    “One trial (Peltola 1986) carried out in twins, reported a possible protective effect of the MMR vaccine with a lower incidence of respiratory symptoms, nausea and vomiting, and no difference in the incidence of other unintended side effects compared with placebo, with the exception of irritability.”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Peltola 1986

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 212

Authors
Peltola, H., & Heinonen, O.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-04
Volume
327
Issue
8487
Pages
939-942
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1981159087
Cited by
212
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
MMR vaccine, vaccine adverse events, live attenuated vaccine, vaccine safety, twin discordance, respiratory symptoms, nausea and vomiting, children
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fever, Humans, Infant, Male, Measles Vaccine, Mumps Vaccine, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rubella Vaccine, Time Factors, Twins, Vaccination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review