Cited by 45Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementPeripheral Nerve DisordersFoot and Ankle Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A comparison of two techniques for ankle Jerk assessment in elderly subjects

O'Keeffe, S.T., Smith, T., Valacio, R., Jack, C.I.A., Playfer, J.R., Lye, M.·1994·The Lancet

Abstract

The reported prevalence of absent ankle jerks in elderly people varies greatly. This variation may be due to differences in the method of testing. Eight physicians examined 12 patients for the presence of ankle jerks using two techniques: plantar strike and tendon strike. Both intra-observer agreement (kappa 0.47 vs 0.20; p = 0.01) and inter-observer agreement (0.57 vs 0.21; p < 0.001) were greater with plantar strike. Reliability of ankle jerk assessment was greater for more experienced examiners. Differences in technique may explain some of the discrepancy between studies examining the prevalence of absent ankle jerks in elderly people.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90411-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Critchley, 1931, Neurology of old age, Lancet, i, 1119, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)90705-0 · DOI
  2. Impallomeni, 1984, The elderly and their ankle jerks, Lancet, i, 670, 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)92181-0 · DOI
  3. Bartko, 1976, On the methods and theory of reliability, J Nerv Ment Dis, 163, 307, 10.1097/00005053-197611000-00003 · DOI
  4. Van Gjin, 1977, Interpretation of plantar reflexes: biasing effects of other symptoms and signs, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 40, 787, 10.1136/jnnp.40.8.787 · DOI
  5. Vogel, 1992, Influence of additional information on interrater reliability in the neurologic examination, Neurology, 42, 2076, 10.1212/WNL.42.11.2076 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
O'Keeffe, S. T., Smith, T., Valacio, R., Jack, C. I. A., Playfer, J. R., & Lye, M.
Affiliations
Royal Liverpool University Hospital (GB)
ORCID
Lye, M.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-12
Volume
344
Issue
8937
Pages
1619-1620
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2082415722
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
ankle jerk, older adults, examiner reliability, interobserver agreement, intraobserver agreement, examiner experience
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ankle, Female, Humans, Male, Reflex, Stretch, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review