The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Continuing increase in mesothelioma mortality in Britain
Open accessAbstract
Mesothelioma is closely related to exposure to asbestos, and mesothelioma mortality can be taken as an index of past exposure to asbestos in the population. We analysed mesothelioma mortality since 1968 to assess the current state of the mesothelioma epidemic, and to predict its future course. We found that rates of mesothelioma in men formed a clear pattern defined by age and date of birth. Rates rose steeply with age showing a very similar pattern in all five-year birth cohorts. By date of birth, rates increased from mid-1893 to mid-1948, and then fell. Relative to the 1943-48 cohort, the risk for the 1948-53 cohort is 0.79 and for the 1953-58 cohort 0.48. Despite these falls, if the age profile of rates for these cohorts follows the pattern of past cohorts, their predicted lifetime mesothelioma risks will be 1.3%, 1.0%, and 0.6%. Combining projections for all cohorts results in a peak of annual male mesothelioma deaths in about the year 2020 of between 2700 and 3300 deaths. If diagnostic trend is responsible for a 20% growth in recorded cases every 5 years--an extreme but arguable case--and if this trend has now ceased, the peak of annual male deaths will be reduced to 1300, reached around the year 2010. Analysis of occupations recorded on death certificates indicate that building workers, especially plumbers and gas fitters, carpenters and electricians are the largest high-risk group. These data indicate that mesothelioma deaths will continue to increase for at least 15 and more likely 25 years. For the worst affected cohorts--men born in the 1940s--mesothelioma may account for around 1% of all deaths. Asbestos exposure at work in construction and building maintenance will account for a large proportion of these deaths, and it is important that such workers should be aware of the risks and take appropriate precautions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting
Straif, K., Baan, R., Grosse, Y., Secretan, B., Ghissassi, F. E., Bouvard, V., Altieri, A., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., & Cogliano, V. (2007) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70373-x · Cited by 1,082
The European mesothelioma epidemic
Peto, J., Decarli, A., Vecchia, C. L., Levi, F., & Negri, E. (1999) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690105 · Cited by 891
Self-citationTrends in cancer incidence and mortality in Scotland: description and possible explanations
Swerdlow, A., dos Santos Silva, I., Reid, A., Qiao, Z., Brewster, D., & Arrundale, J. (1998) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1998.424 · Cited by 532
Novel Insights into Mesothelioma Biology and Implications for Therapy
Yap, T. A., Aerts, J. G., Popat, S., & Fennell, D. A. (2017) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.42 · Cited by 324
Edwards, J. G. (2000) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.55.9.731 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Peto, J., Matthews, F. E., Hodgson, J. T., & Jones, J. R.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 8949
- Pages
- 535-539
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W1976428603
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuing increase in mesothelioma mortality in Britain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90462-x
- The paper
- Peto, J., Matthews, F. E., Hodgson, J. T., & Jones, J. R. (1995). Continuing increase in mesothelioma mortality in Britain. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90462-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.