CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7Child Abuse and Related TraumaChild Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suspected sexual abuse in a 10-year-old girl

v Mühlendahl, Karl Ernst·1996·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03448-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03448-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
v Mühlendahl, K. E.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-07
Volume
348
Issue
9019
Pages
30
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03448-4
OpenAlex
W2094983629
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, pediatric gynecology, hymen, pubic hair, pubertal development, bone age, differential diagnosis
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Vulva, Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suspected sexual abuse in a 10-year-old girl. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03448-4
The paper
v Mühlendahl, K. E. (1996). Suspected sexual abuse in a 10-year-old girl. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03448-4