The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: a survey of model studies
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CO2 Prices, Energy and Weather
Mansanet-Bataller, M., Pardo, A., & Valor, E. (2007) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol28-no3-5 · Cited by 472
An overview of current research on EU ETS: Evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect
Zhang, Y.-J., & Wei, Y.-M. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.12.019 · Cited by 433
Analysis of Travel Times and CO 2 Emissions in Time‐Dependent Vehicle Routing
Jabali, O., VanWoensel, T., & de Kok, A. G. (2012) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01338.x · Cited by 332
The Role of Economics in Climate Change Policy
McKibbin, W. J., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (2002) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330027283 · Cited by 316
Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism
Michaelowa, A., & Jotzo, F. (2005) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.016 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Springer, U.
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 527-551
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081978178
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: a survey of model studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-9883(02)00103-2
- The paper
- Springer, U. (2003). The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: a survey of model studies. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-9883(02)00103-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
