The diagnostic utility of sexual behavior problems in diagnosing sexual abuse in a forensic child abuse evaluation clinic
Abstract
Objective This study examined the utility of sexual behavior problems as a diagnostic indicator of sexual abuse. The hypothesis was that sexual behavior problems are multiply determined and consequently are variably related to sexual abuse in a clinical sample. Method A sample of 247 children evaluated for sexual abuse at a multidisciplinary forensic child abuse evaluation clinic were included. Results from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Child Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI) were analyzed and compared to the results of a structured abuse assessment performed independent of these scores. Results The forensic team assessment found evidence of sexual abuse in 25% of cases, and no evidence in 61%. Children in this sample exhibited an elevated level of both sexual and nonsexual behavior problems. However, considerable variability was noted in sexual behavior problem scores. Thus, in this study a high score or a low score had no relationship to the diagnosis of sexual abuse. Indeed, nonsexually abused children were just as likely to have high CSBI scores as sexually abused children. Conclusions This study found no significant relationship between a diagnosis of sexual abuse and the presence or absence of sexual behavior problems in a sample of children referred for sexual abuse evaluation. The finding suggests that community professionals should use caution in relying on sexual behavior problems as a diagnostic indicator of abuse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study using CSBI total scale scores, it was not possible to discriminate sexually abused children from those who had not been through this experience, showing that concluding sexual abuse from inappropriate sexualized behaviors may be misguided.
“in a study conducted from CSBI total scale scores, it was not possible to discriminate sexually abused children from those who had not been through this experiment, showing that to conclude the occurrence of sexual abuse from the presence of inappropriate sexualized behaviors may be misguided (Drach et al., 2001).”
From Psychological and Behavioral Indicators in the Forensic Assessment of Child Sexual Abuse (2018) · cites this paper as Drach et al., 2001
Previous studies have found no statistically significant differences in the sexualized behaviors variable.
“Previous studies have also found no statistically signifi cant differences in this variable (Drach, Wientzen, & Ricci, 2001;Peixoto, 2012).”
From Psychological and Behavioral Indicators in the Forensic Assessment of Child Sexual Abuse (2018) · cites this paper as Drach, Wientzen, & Ricci, 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Drach, K. M., Wientzen, J., & Ricci, L. R.
- Corresponding author
- Drach, Kerry M
- Venue
- Child Abuse & Neglect
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 489-503
- ISSN
- 0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042402253
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
- Keywords
- child sexual abuse, problematic sexual behavior, diagnostic biomarkers, Child Behavior Checklist, child sexual behavior
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review