Trends in child maltreatment literature
Abstract
Introduction To identify possible gaps in the child maltreatment literature the present study examined the development of the child maltreatment literature over a 22-year period, including temporal trends for child maltreatment types, the characteristics of the research participants, and sources of participant recruitment. Method Child maltreatment articles (N=2090) published from 1977 to 1998 (inclusive) in six specialty journals were coded on type of article, type of child maltreatment, gender and parental status of participants, abuse role of participants, and recruitment source of participants. Results Across the period studied the annual percentage of quantitative articles (articles with inferential statistics) increased, whereas the annual percentage of theoretical articles decreased. The annual percentage of articles examining child physical abuse (CPA) decreased, whereas the annual percentage of articles examining child sexual abuse (CSA) increased. The percentages of articles examining child neglect (CN) or child emotional abuse (CEA) remained consistently low. Distinguishing child maltreatment types in research articles increased. Males were underrepresented in CPA perpetration and CPA adult victimization articles, but adequately represented in CSA perpetration and CPA child victimization articles. Females were adequately represented in CPA perpetration and CSA child and adult victimization articles. Recruitment from universities and outpatient mental health facilit…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Treatment of child neglect is far less studied than treatment of child physical abuse.
“However, treatment of child neglect is far less studied (Behl, Conyngham, & May, 2003; Chaffin, 2006).”
From A controlled evaluation of family behavior therapy in concurrent child neglect and drug abuse. (2014) · cites this paper as Behl, Conyngham, & May, 2003
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 25 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Behl, L. E., Conyngham, H. A., & May, P. F.
- Affiliations
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Corresponding author
- May, Patricia F
- Venue
- Child Abuse & Neglect
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-229
- ISSN
- 0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013841555
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Northern Illinois University
- U.S. Public Health Service (44-G1B66546)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- child abuse, research trends, child physical abuse, child sexual abuse, child neglect, childhood emotional abuse, gender representation in research, research gaps, publication trends
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Periodicals as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review