CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 337Child Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Therapy and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-year follow-up study of cognitive behavioral therapy for sexually abused children suffering post-traumatic stress symptoms

Deblinger, Esther, Steer, Robert A., Lippmann, Julie·1999·Child Abuse & Neglect
DOI 10.1016/s0145-2134(99)00091-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective The present study sought to determine whether the 12-session pre- to posttest therapeutic gains that had been found by Deblinger, Lippmann. and Steer (1996) for an initial sample of 100 sexually abused children suffering posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms would be sustained 2 years after treatment.Method These sexually abused children, along with their nonoffending mothers, had been randomly assigned to one of three cognitive-behavioral treatment conditions, child only, mother only, or mother and child, or a community comparison condition, and were followed for 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment.Results A series of repeated MANCOVAs, controlling for the pre-test scores, indicated that for the three measures of psychopathology that had significantly decreased in the original study (i.e., externalizing behavior problems, depression, and PTSD symptoms), these measures at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were comparable to the posttest scores.Conclusions These findings suggest that the pre- to post-treatment improvements held across the 2-year follow-up period. The clinical and research implications of these findings are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0145-2134(99)00091-5

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. SAS Institute, Inc. (1990). SAS/STAT user’s guide, ver. 6, 4th ed., vol. 2. Cary, NC: Author.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 337

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Deblinger, E., Steer, R. A., & Lippmann, J.
Affiliations
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Deblinger, Esther
ORCID
Deblinger, Esther
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
1371-1378
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0145-2134(99)00091-5
OpenAlex
W2028622212
Cited by
337
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
16.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (90-CA-1461)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, child sexual abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder, maintenance of treatment effects, long-term follow-up, externalizing problems, depression, mothers of abused children, psychopathology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review