The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Instantons at work
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this review is to demonstrate that there exists a coherent picture of strong interactions, based on instantons. Starting from the first principles of QCD - via the microscopic mechanism of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking - one arrives to a quantitative description of light hadron properties, with no fitting parameters. The discussion of the importance of instanton-induced interactions in soft high-energy scattering is new.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Symmetry Breaking through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies
't Hooft, G. (1976) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.8 · Cited by 3,362
Cited by
Mapping the phases of quantum chromodynamics with beam energy scan
Bzdak, A., Esumi, S., Koch, V., Liao, J., Stephanov, M., & Xu, N. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.01.005 · Cited by 465
Abelev, B. I., Aggarwal, M. M., Ahammed, Z., Alakhverdyants, A. V., Anderson, B. D., Arkhipkin, D., Averichev, G. S., Balewski, J., Barannikova, O., Barnby, L. S., et al. (2010) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.81.054908 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Diakonov, D.
- Venue
- Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 173-222
- ISSN
- 0146-6410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011110500
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Instantons at work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0146-6410(03)90014-7
- The paper
- Diakonov, D. (2003). Instantons at work. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-6410(03)90014-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
