Gender bias in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease
Abstract
Women are at high risk for cardiovascular disorders, but referrals for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures seem to reflect a gender bias. Procedures and therapies currently used have been developed predominantly or exclusively for men. Medical history demonstrates a disregard of women's health problems that still may be operative today. Women are older and sicker when they have angioplasty or bypass grafting, and they receive far fewer implantable cardioverter defibrillators and heart transplantations. They have more hypertension, diabetes, longer stays in intensive care units, and poorer outcomes. This may be the result of a problem with referral or a difference in the way women experience cardiac symptoms. It may also be related to the way women perceive themselves and their illness. Efforts are being made to provide equitable and relevant health care for women and to conduct research that will describe women's cardiac symptoms and their responses to cardiovascular technology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In regard to sex and gender, these assumptions have influenced the perception of risk and individual and collective ways of living which have harmed women's health.
“In regard to sex and gender, these assumptions have influenced (and still do LERU, 2015) the perception of risk and individual and collective ways of living which, in this case, have harmed women's health (Beery, 1995; Legato, 1998).”
From Health From a Gender Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Beery, 1995
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Beery, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beery, Theresa A.
- Venue
- Heart & Lung
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 427-435
- ISSN
- 0147-9563 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020340052
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Heart & Lung (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- gender bias, coronary artery disease, women's cardiovascular health, diagnostic referral, angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, heart transplantation, sex differences in treatment outcomes, health care equity
- MeSH terms
- Coronary Artery Bypass, Attitude of Health Personnel, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Prejudice, Referral and Consultation, Research, Women's Health, Angioplasty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review