Cited by 299Restless Legs Syndrome ResearchSleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Evaluating the quality of life of patients with restless legs syndrome

Abetz, Linda, Allen, Richard, Follet, Alain, Washburn, Tinna, Early, Christopher, Kirsch, Jeff, Knight, Helen·2004·Clinical Therapeutics

Abstract

Background The primary morbidities of restless legs syndrome (RLS) involve sleep loss, extreme discomfort, and disruption of normal activities. Although the condition is not life-threatening, assessing the disease burden and the impact of RLS on quality of life (QOL) is critical for evaluating treatment benefits. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of RLS on QOL. Methods In this subanalysis of a specific validation study, the SF-36 (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form health survey) was administered to 85 patients with primary RLS who had been referred to a sleep-medicine clinic. The scores were compared with published norms for the general population (N = 2474). Results The majority (63.5%) of RLS patients were women; the mean (SD) age was 62.4 (14.0) years; 67.1% of patients experienced RLS symptoms almost daily. The RLS group, particularly patients with more severe RLS, reported significant deficits (10-40 points on 100-points scales) in physical functioning, bodily pain, role functioning, mental health, general health, and vitality compared with the general population. The RLS sample had significantly lower scores (worse QOL) on all 8 scales of the SF-36 compared with patients with hypertension (P Conclusions Comparison of the SF-36 scores of patients with RLS and the normative general population suggests that the disorder has a significant impact on patient QOL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90136-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abetz, L., Allen, R., Follet, A., Washburn, T., Early, C., Kirsch, J., & Knight, H.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Clinical Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
925-935
ISSN
0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023740305
Cited by
299
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG016362, 1R01 AG-16362)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Restless Legs Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
restless legs syndrome, quality of life, SF-36, disease burden, physical function, mental health, bodily pain, role functioning, vitality, sleep disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Restless Legs Syndrome, United States, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review