The regulation of total body fat: lessons learned from lipectomy studies
Abstract
Surgical removal of body fat (partial lipectomy) is a means of directly reducing fat such that metabolic and behavioral responses can be readily attributed to the lipid deficit. If total body fat is regulated, then lipectomy should trigger compensatory increases in nonexcised white adipose tissue (WAT) mass and/or regrowth at excision sites. Many species, including laboratory rats and mice, show lipectomy-induced compensatory recovery of body fat. Those animals exhibiting naturally occurring annual adiposity cycles, such as ground squirrels and hamsters, do so most impressively reaching seasonally appropriate body fat levels indistinguishable from controls. Reparation of the lipid deficit occurs without an increase in food intake, and generally through enlargement of non-excised WAT mass, rather than regrowth of excised WAT. A body fat regulatory system involving humoral and sensory neural inputs to the brain as well as sympathetic neural outputs from brain to adipose tissue is presented. Collectively, the lipectomy model appears useful for testing mechanisms controlling adiposity, or individual depot growth, and offers insight into how lipid stores fluctuate naturally.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data from studies conducted in lipectomized animal models demonstrate that regeneration of the removed fat pad is rare, but compensatory fat accumulation at other sites commonly occurs.
“Data from studies conducted in lipectomized animal models demonstrate that regeneration of the removed fat pad is rare, but compensatory fat accumulation at other sites commonly occurs (18).”
From Long-term Effects of Large-volume Liposuction on Metabolic Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease (2008) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 182 · Cited by 112
- Authors
- Mauer, M. M., Harris, R. B. S., & Bartness, T. J.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bartness, Timothy J.
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-28
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039044854
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 182
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1f31mh010803-01a1)
- National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH10803)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK-35254, R01DK053903, R01 DK-53903, R01DK035254)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
- Keywords
- lipectomy, body fat regulation, adipose tissue, ground squirrels, hamster, sympathetic nervous system, dietary intake
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Animals, Body Composition, Humans, Lipectomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review