Cited by 112Regulation of Appetite and ObesityAdipose Tissue and MetabolismLipid metabolism and biosynthesis

The regulation of total body fat: lessons learned from lipectomy studies

Mauer, Mary Margaret, Harris, Ruth B.S., Bartness, Timothy J.·2001·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Surgical removal of body fat (partial lipectomy) is a means of directly reducing fat such that metabolic and behavioral responses can be readily attributed to the lipid deficit. If total body fat is regulated, then lipectomy should trigger compensatory increases in nonexcised white adipose tissue (WAT) mass and/or regrowth at excision sites. Many species, including laboratory rats and mice, show lipectomy-induced compensatory recovery of body fat. Those animals exhibiting naturally occurring annual adiposity cycles, such as ground squirrels and hamsters, do so most impressively reaching seasonally appropriate body fat levels indistinguishable from controls. Reparation of the lipid deficit occurs without an increase in food intake, and generally through enlargement of non-excised WAT mass, rather than regrowth of excised WAT. A body fat regulatory system involving humoral and sensory neural inputs to the brain as well as sympathetic neural outputs from brain to adipose tissue is presented. Collectively, the lipectomy model appears useful for testing mechanisms controlling adiposity, or individual depot growth, and offers insight into how lipid stores fluctuate naturally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00047-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data from studies conducted in lipectomized animal models demonstrate that regeneration of the removed fat pad is rare, but compensatory fat accumulation at other sites commonly occurs.

    “Data from studies conducted in lipectomized animal models demonstrate that regeneration of the removed fat pad is rare, but compensatory fat accumulation at other sites commonly occurs (18).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 182 · Cited by 112

Authors
Mauer, M. M., Harris, R. B. S., & Bartness, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bartness, Timothy J.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
15-28
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039044854
Cited by
112
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f31mh010803-01a1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH10803)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK-35254, R01DK053903, R01 DK-53903, R01DK035254)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
lipectomy, body fat regulation, adipose tissue, ground squirrels, hamster, sympathetic nervous system, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Animals, Body Composition, Humans, Lipectomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review