d-amphetamine, cocaine and caffeine: a comparative study of acute effects on locomotor activity and behavioural patterns in rats
Abstract
Although open-field behaviour has been considered a valid and reliable index of locomotor activity in rodents, the simple measures traditionally recorded in this test do not readily allow for differentiation between compounds of the same general class, e.g. psychostimulants. The present methodology was developed to facilitate detailed and continuous observations on the behaviour of drug-treated rats. In addition to an automated (photocell) measure of general locomotor activity, ethological techniques were used to record the frequency and duration of standing, moving, sniffing, rearing, grooming, scratching, sniffing air, freezing, head-swinging and licking. A series of factor analyses was also performed in order to further characterize treatment-induced changes in the structure of behaviour. Compounds studied were d-amphetamine (0.5, 1.5, 3, 6 mg/kg), cocaine (5, 10, 20, 50 mg/kg) and caffeine (5, 10, 20, 40 mg/kg). Although all three psychostimulants increased the automated measure of general locomotor activity, cocaine (which produced the largest effects) monotonically increased general activity over the dose range tested, whereas the stimulant effects of the other two compounds were either reduced (d-amphetamine) or eliminated (caffeine) at higher doses. More detailed observations provided confirmation of the differences in effect produced by these compounds. For example, the frequency and duration of 'moving' dose-dependently increased after cocaine, while d-amphetamine a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Locomotor activity measurement is a method used to evaluate the behavioral stimulant properties of drugs.
“Locomotor activity measurement is a method used to evaluate the behavioral stimulant properties of drugs (36).”
Antoniou et al. concluded that amphetamine had a complex effect on locomotion, characterized mainly by motor activation at lower doses and stereotypy at high doses.
“Antoniou et al. concluded that amphetamine had a complex effect on locomotion, characterized mainly by motor activation at lower doses and stereotypy at high doses (36).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jian-min, C., Zhi-yuan, W., Shi-xuan, W., Rui, S., Ning, W., & Jin, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.885574 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“concluded that amphetamine had a complex effect on locomotion, characterized mainly by motor activation at lower doses and stereotypy at high doses (36).”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Antoniou, K., Kafetzopoulos, E., Papadopoulou-Daifoti, Z., Hyphantis, T., & Marselos, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Ioannina (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Antoniou, K
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-196
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023971815
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Keywords
- d-amphetamine, cocaine, caffeine, psychostimulants, locomotor activity, behavioral patterns, stereotypy, dose-response relationship, behavioral pharmacology, open field behavior, ethological observation
- MeSH terms
- Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Caffeine, Cocaine, Dextroamphetamine, Grooming, Male, Motor Activity, Posture, Rats, Wistar, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Head Movements, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review