Cited by 154Stress Responses and CortisolNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Neural plasticity, neuropeptides and anxiety in animals — implications for understanding and treating affective disorder following traumatic stress in humans

Adamec, R, Kent, P, Anisman, H, Shallow, T, Merali, Z·1998·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Exposure of rats to cats (predator stress) lastingly increases rodent anxiety-like behavior (ALB) in the elevated plus-maze. Previous work shows that lasting changes in ALB following predator stress depend on NMDA and CCKB receptors. In this paper we describe the effects of differing degrees of predator exposure on behavior. Effects depend on the behavioral measure. In general, exposure to predator odor is less provocative of lasting change in ALB than is unprotected exposure to a cat. In addition, we examine the development of effects of unprotected predator exposure over time. Lasting effects on ALB begin at 30 min to 1 h after predator stress and persist for at least 3 weeks. We also report a complex pattern of effects of predator stress on neuroendocrine and stress peptide (bombesin, CRF and AVP) levels in a variety of brain areas. Not surprisingly, predator exposure increases plasma levels of corticosterone and ACTH. Central changes in peptide content in the hypothalamo-pituitary axis, related hypothalamic nuclei, limbic and brain stem areas are also noted. Finally, path analysis demonstrates a replicable relationship between cat behavior, rat defensive behavior and degree of increase in ALB one week later. It is proposed that behavioral changes following predator stress may model anxiety associated with PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7634(98)00032-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 154

Authors
Adamec, R., Kent, P., Anisman, H., Shallow, T., & Merali, Z.
Affiliations
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Adamec, R
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
301-318
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994455743
Cited by
154
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
predator stress, anxiety-like behavior, elevated plus maze, NMDA receptor, CCK-B receptor, neuropeptides, bombesin, corticotropin-releasing factor, vasopressin, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, corticosterone, ACTH, traumatic stress, post-traumatic stress disorder, defensive behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Brain Chemistry, Cats, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Neuronal Plasticity, Neuropeptides, Predatory Behavior, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Mood Disorders, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review