Neurochemical mechanisms of the defensive behavior in the dorsal midbrain
Abstract
Some regions in the mesencephalon, such as dorsal periaqueductal gray, inferior colliculus and deep layers of superior colliculus have been grouped together as a continuous strip of midbrain structures involved in the integration of the different components of aversive states in the brain. In fact, escape behavior and defensive, or fear-like behavior often result when these sites are electrically or chemically stimulated. Moreover, the behavioral responses induced by stimulation of these structures are, in general, accompanied by increases in mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate and respiration, and by analgesia. Both the behavioral and autonomic consequences of electrical stimulation of the mesencephalic tectum was shown to be attenuated by minor tranquilizers, probably through enhancement of GABAergic neurotransmission. Besides GABAergic interneurons which exert a tonic inhibitory control on neural circuits responsible for the behavioral correlates of the aversion in the above-mentioned structures, several other mechanisms such as opioid, neuropeptides, serotonergic and excitatory amino acids have also been implicated in the regulation of these processes. As to the analgesia that accompanies these aversive states it is mediated by non-opioid mechanisms, particularly by serotonergic ones through 5-HT2 receptors. Now, efforts have been made to characterize the mode of action of these neurotransmitters on their multiple receptors and how they interact with each other to produce or regulate the neural substrates of aversion in the midbrain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dorsolateral periaqueductal grey activation is predominantly associated with active defensive behaviours such as fight-or-flight.
“dlPAG activation is predominantly associated with active defensive behaviours such as fight-or-flight [53].”
From Freeze for action: neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing (2017) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 133 · Cited by 280
- Authors
- Brandão, M. L., Anseloni, V. Z., Pandóssio, J. E., De Araújo, J. E., & Castilho, V. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Brandão, M.L.
- ORCID
- Brandão, M.L.
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 863-875
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070623386
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 133
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- defensive behavior, fear, midbrain, periaqueductal gray, inferior colliculus, superior colliculus, escape behavior, GABAergic neurotransmission, minor tranquilizers, neuropeptides, serotonergic neurotransmission, 5-HT2 receptor, non-opioid analgesia, excitatory amino acids, autonomic responses, neurotransmitter interactions
- MeSH terms
- Aggression, Animals, Brain Chemistry, Humans, Mesencephalon, Receptors, Neurotransmitter, Neurotransmitter Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review