The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Real-time technology assessment
Abstract
Abstract Social science scholarship has identified complex linkages between society and science, but it has been less successful at actually enhancing those linkages in ways that can add to the value and capability of each sector. We propose a research program to integrate natural science and engineering investigations with social science and policy research from the outset — what we call “real-time technology assessment” (real-time TA). Comprising investigations into analogical case studies, research program mapping, communication and early warning, and technology assessment and choice, real-time TA can inform and support natural science and engineering research, and it can provide an explicit mechanism for observing, critiquing, and influencing social values as they become embedded in innovations. After placing real-time TA in the context of scholarship on technology assessment, the paper elaborates on this coordinated set of research tasks, using the example of nano-scale science and engineering (nanotechnology) research. The paper then discusses issues in the implementation of real-time TA and concludes that the adoption of real-time TA can significantly enhance the societal value of research-based innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 3,184
A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation
von Schomberg, R. (2013) · Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1002/9781118551424.ch3 · Cited by 1,299
A Framework for Responsible Innovation
Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013) · Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1002/9781118551424.ch2 · Cited by 730
Self-citationImplications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research
Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002 · Cited by 649
Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?
Macnaghten, P., Kearnes, M. B., & Wynne, B. (2005) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547005281531 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Guston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D.
- Venue
- Technology in Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 93-109
- ISSN
- 0160-791X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044039018
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-time technology assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0160-791x(01)00047-1
- The paper
- Guston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-791x(01)00047-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.