The prevalence of age-related maculopathy: the visual impairment project
Abstract
Purpose To determine the prevalence of age-related maculopathy (ARM) lesions in residents of the state of Victoria, Australia.Design Population-based cross-sectional study.Participants Total of 5147 residential and institutionalized persons aged 40 years and older, living in Victoria.Methods Participants were recruited through a cluster, stratified, random sampling from nine urban clusters and four rural clusters. The presence of ARM lesions was graded from color stereo fundus photographs as well as slit-lamp stereo biomicroscopy according to the International Classification and Grading System.Main outcome measures The presence of ARM lesions.Results The mean age of participants was 60.2 years, and 55% were females. Gradable fundus photographs were available for at least one eye in 4345 (92%) of the participants. The weighted prevalence of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was 0.39% (95% confidence limits [CL] = 0.20, 0.58), atrophic AMD was 0. 27% (95% CL = 0.04, 0.50), and total AMD was 0.68% (95% CL = 0.30, 1. 1). Prevalence of AMD was strongly related to age (P < 0.001). Prevalence of early ARM was 15.1% (95% CL = 13.7, 16.4). Large drusen, 125 micrometer or more, were present in 6.3% of the participants. There was a higher prevalence of soft distinct drusen (7.5%) than soft indistinct drusen (4.3%). Retinal pigmentary abnormalities were present in 8.2% (95% CL = 7.2, 9.2). The prevalence of large drusen, soft drusen, and pigmentary abnormalities increased with age (P < 0. 001). Prevalence of retinal pigmentary abnormalities increased with increasing drusen size (P < 0.001). Soft indistinct drusen were more common in women aged 70 years or older (P < 0.001). Bilaterality of any ARM was strongly age related, and women appeared to have a higher risk of both bilateral early ARM and AMD.Conclusions These data provide age- and gender-specific prevalence of ARM and its component lesions in an ethnically diverse Australian population. Early ARM and AMD prevalence rates increased sharply from ages 70 and 80 years, respectively, in all ethnic groups. These higher rates will continue to increase the importance of AMD as our population ages.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Age is the strongest risk factor for age-related macular degeneration; all population-based studies confirm that the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration increases with age in white individuals.
“Age is the strongest risk factor for age-related macular degeneration; all population-based studies confirm that the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration increases with age in white individuals.3,22–27”
From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 222
- Authors
- VanNewkirk, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- VanNewkirk, M
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1593-1600
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003167012
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Keywords
- age-related maculopathy, age-related macular degeneration, prevalence, neovascular AMD, atrophic AMD, drusen, bilateral disease, sex differences, age differences, population-based study, Victoria, Australia, visual impairment, fundus photography grading, slit lamp examination, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Photography, Rural Population, Urban Population, Victoria, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review