Five-year incidence of age-related maculopathy lesions
Abstract
Purpose To describe the 5-year incidence and progression of early and late age-related maculopathy (ARM) lesions.Design Population-based cohort study.Participants Three thousand six hundred fifty-four noninstitutionalized residents, aged 49 years or older, living in the Blue Mountains area west of Sydney, Australia, participated in the study during 1992 to 1994. The cohort was reexamined after 5 years (1997-1999). Excluding 543 participants who died since the baseline, 2335 (75%) survivors attended 5-year follow-up examinations.Methods Retinal photographs from both examinations were graded using the Wisconsin ARM Grading System. Photographs of participants with any ARM lesions at either examination were regraded in detail using a modification of the side-by-side method developed for the Beaver Dam Eye Study.Main outcome measures Incidence and progression of ARM lesions were defined in a similar manner to that used in the Beaver Dam Eye Study.Results Incidence rates for all ARM lesions increased significantly with age. For late ARM lesions (geographic atrophy and neovascular ARM), the overall 5-year incidence was 1.1%. The combined late ARM incidence was 0.0%, 0.6%, 2.4%, and 5.4% for participants aged 60 years and younger, 60 to 69 years, 70 to 79 years, and 80 years and older at baseline, respectively. After excluding participants with either early or late ARM in either eye at baseline, the overall 5-year incidence of early ARM was 8.7%, including 3.2%, 7.4%, 18.3%, and 14.8% for the corresponding age groups. The incidence of neovascular ARM in women was double that for men (P = 0.1).Conclusions This study has documented the incidence of ARM lesions in an older Australian population. The slightly higher incidence of hyperpigmentation found in our population compared with the Beaver Dam Eye Study may be due to sample variability, or this could reflect real differences between the two populations. Our lower incidence of soft drusen could have resulted from our non-inclusion of intermediate soft drusen in the soft distinct and indistinct drusen categories.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration increases with age, as does the development of large drusen and pigmentary changes.
“These three large population-based studies have found that the incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration increases with age, as does the development of large drusen and pigmentary changes.”
From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [17]
In regression models that adjust for age as a continuous variable, rather than by decade, the effect of sex on risk of age-related macular degeneration was not statistically significant.
“However, in regression models that adjust for age as a continuous variable, rather than by decade, the effect of sex on risk of age-related macular degeneration was not statistically significant.17”
From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [17]
The overall 5-year incidence of the development of large drusen or pigmentary changes was 8.7%, ranging from 3.2% in those aged less than 60 years to 18.3% in those aged 70-79 years and 14.8% in those older than 80 years.
“The overall 5-year incidence of the development of large drusen or pigmentary changes was 8·7%, ranging from 3·2% in those aged less than 60 years to 18·3% in those aged 70–79 years and 14·8% in those older than 80 years.17,18”
From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [17]
The Blue Mountains Eye Study estimated the overall 5-year incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration to be 1.1%, increasing from 0% in individuals under 60 years of age to 5.4% in those aged 80 years or older.
“The Blue Mountains Eye Study estimated the overall 5-year incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration to be 1·1%; increasing from 0% in individuals under 60 years of age to 5·4% in those aged 80 years or older.”
From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 251
- Authors
- Mitchell, P., Wang, J. J., Foran, S., & Smith, W.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Mitchell, Paul
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1092-1097
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965038445
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Keywords
- age-related maculopathy, incidence, disease progression, geographic atrophy, soft drusen, hyperpigmentation, sex differences, age-related macular degeneration
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Photography, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review