The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Conjunctival Autografts, Amniotic Membrane Grafts, and Primary Closure for Pterygium Excision
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to determine whether amniotic membrane can be used as an alternative to conjunctival autograft after pterygium excision. DESIGN: A prospective study of amniotic membrane grafts (group A) and primary closure (group B) was compared retrospectively with conjunctival autografts (group C) in patients with pterygia. PARTICIPANTS: Group A included 46 eyes with primary pterygia and 8 eyes with recurrent pterygia, group B had 20 eyes with primary pterygia, and group C consisted of 78 eyes with primary and 44 eyes with recurrent pterygia. INTERVENTION: For the above three different surgeries, the amount of tissue removed was estimated from histopathologic analysis, and the result was evaluated by clinical examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence, survival analysis, and final appearance were compared. RESULTS: In group A, the recurrence rate was 10.9%, 37.5%, and 14.8% for primary, recurrent, and all pterygia, respectively (mean follow-up, 11 months). These three rates were significantly higher than 2.6%, 9.1%, and 4.9% noted in group C (mean follow-up, 23 months) (P < 0.001, 0.018, and 0.01, respectively). However, the latter recurrence rate was significantly lower than 45% (mean follow-up, 5.2 months) in group B for primary pterygia (P < 0.001). The onset of recurrence was delayed significantly in group C as compared with that of groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low recurrence rate for primary pterygia allows one to use amniotic membrane transplantation as an alternative first choice, especially for advanced cases with bilateral heads or those who might need glaucoma surgery later.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction
Azuara-Blanco, A., Pillai, C. T., & Dua, H. S. (1999) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.83.4.399 · Cited by 435
The Potential of Amniotic Membrane/Amnion-Derived Cells for Regeneration of Various Tissues
Toda, A., Okabe, M., Yoshida, T., & Nikaido, T. (2007) · Journal of Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1254/jphs.cr0070034 · Cited by 386
Lee, J. H., Ryu, I. H., Kim, E. K., Lee, J. E., Hong, S., & Lee, H. K. (2006) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0596 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Prabhasawat, P., Barton, K., Burkett, G., & Tseng, S. C. G.
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 974-985
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987759761
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Conjunctival Autografts, Amniotic Membrane Grafts, and Primary Closure for Pterygium Excision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30197-3
- The paper
- Prabhasawat, P., Barton, K., Burkett, G., & Tseng, S. C. G. (1997). Comparison of Conjunctival Autografts, Amniotic Membrane Grafts, and Primary Closure for Pterygium Excision. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30197-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.