Cited by 53Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsOphthalmology and Visual Health ResearchOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with diabetes presenting to an urban public hospital ophthalmology clinic

Baker, Richard S., Watkins, Neil L., Wilson, M.Roy, Bazargan, Mohsen, Flowers, Charles W.·1998·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective This study aims to describe the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients with diabetes who are newly presenting to an inner city public hospital eye clinic. This study also aims to determine the prevalence and severity of ocular morbidity in this population at time presentation and to assess the adequacy of the ophthalmic surveillance to which this population was exposed before presentation. Design A clinic-based, cross-sectional study. Participants A total of 118 consecutive patients with diabetes participated. Method During a 2-month interval, all patients with diabetes newly presenting to the Los Angeles County King-Drew Medical Center eye clinic were recruited who were at risk for diabetic eye complications according to American Diabetes Association criteria. Each patient underwent a standardized interviewer-administered questionnaire and a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. Results Of the 118 patients, 65 (55%) were Hispanic and 51 (43%) were African American. Forty-six percent had a grade school education or less, 91% were unemployed, and 64% had no health insurance. Type two diabetes was predominant (91%), including 24 (22%) of new onset. Thirty-six patients with diabetes (31%) reported duration of diabetes greater than 10 years at time of presentation. At time of presentation, 62% had clinically apparent ophthalmic disease, whereas 40% had advanced ocular disease, including 6.8% of the sample that were legally blind. Sixty-nine patients (…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0161-6420(98)98015-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, R. S., Watkins, N. L., Wilson, M. R., Bazargan, M., & Flowers, C. W.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (US)
Corresponding author
Baker, Richard S.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-08
Volume
105
Issue
8
Pages
1373-1379
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135234115
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (G12RR003026, G12 RR03026-09)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, diabetic eye disease, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic retinopathy screening, low socioeconomic status, racial and ethnic minorities, type 2 diabetes, legal blindness, ocular morbidity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Ethnicity, Eye Diseases, Female, Health Services, Hospitals, County, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ophthalmology, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population, Los Angeles, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review