Cited by 41Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteinsInorganic and Organometallic ChemistryChemistry and Stereochemistry Studies

A chemical approach to systematically designate the pyranopterin centers of molybdenum and tungsten enzymes and synthetic models

Fischer, Berthold, Enemark, John H., Basu, Partha·1998·Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry

Abstract

The recent growth in the chemistry of the oxo-molybdenum enzymes has demonstrated the need for developing systematic methods for naming and abbreviating the novel pterin cofactors that bind to the metal ion via the sulfur atoms of an ene-1,2-dithiolate moiety. Historically, the term "molybdopterin" was coined to designate a special pterin that binds molybdenum and the molybdenum-bound form was termed the "molybdenum cofactor". However, recent studies have demonstrated that this novel pterin also binds tungsten. Furthermore, considerable variation has been found in the pterin entity itself. Taken together, these facts show that molybdenum- and tungsten-containing enzymes possess a family of cofactors rather than a single "molybdenum cofactor". This article proposes a unified methodology for describing these cofactors and their metal-free pterin units in light of recent results from protein crystallography. The various numbering schemes that have been used for this heterocycle are considered, as well as the IUPAC rules which are currently being used for related tricyclic compounds. A unified methodology for uniquely designating and abbreviating each cofactor is proposed. The available chemical and spectroscopic information on the pyranopterin entities that are present in the molybdenum and tungsten enzymes, the precursors to these centers, and synthetic pyranopterins are in part the basis of the systematic names and simplifying abbreviations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0162-0134(98)10054-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The two electron oxidation of any of the isomeric forms of pyranopterin would lead to the fully oxidized ring open structure.

    “The two electron oxidation of any of the isomeric forms would lead to the fully oxidized ring open structure.”

    From Nitrate and periplasmic nitrate reductases (2014) · cites this paper as [112]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 41

Authors
Fischer, B., Enemark, J. H., & Basu, P.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Berthold
Venue
Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
72
Issue
1-2
Pages
13-21
ISSN
0162-0134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086074673
Cited by
41
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 37773, R01GM037773)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
Keywords
molybdenum cofactor, molybdenum enzymes, tungsten enzymes, pterin cofactor, systematic nomenclature, IUPAC rules, tricyclic heterocycles, crystal structure
MeSH terms
Models, Chemical, Molybdenum, Terminology as Topic, Pterins, Tungsten

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review