Cited by 151Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsInflammation biomarkers and pathways

Is nitric oxide overproduction the target of choice for the management of septic shock?

Feihl, François, Waeber, Bernard, Liaudet, Lucas·2001·Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Sepsis is a heterogeneous class of syndromes caused by a systemic inflammatory response to infection. Septic shock, a severe form of sepsis, is associated with the development of progressive damage in multiple organs, and is a leading cause of patient mortality in intensive care units. Despite important advances in understanding its pathophysiology, therapy remains largely symptomatic and supportive. A decade ago, the overproduction of nitric oxide (NO) had been discovered as a potentially important event in this condition. As a result, great hopes arose that the pharmacological inhibition of NO synthesis could be developed into an efficient, mechanism-based therapeutic approach. Since then, an extraordinary effort by the scientific community has brought a deeper insight regarding the feasibility of this goal. Here we present in summary form the present state of knowledge of the biological chemistry and physiology of NO. We then proceed to a systematic review of experimental and clinical data, indicating an up-regulation of NO production in septic shock; information on the role of NO in septic shock, as provided by experiments in transgenic mice that lack the ability to up-regulate NO production; effects of pharmacological inhibitors of NO production in various experimental models of septic shock; and relevant clinical experience. The accrued evidence suggests that the contribution of NO to the pathophysiology of septic shock is highly heterogeneous and, therefore, difficult to target therapeutically without appropriate monitoring tools, which do not exist at present.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0163-7258(01)00155-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 437 · Cited by 151

Authors
Feihl, F., Waeber, B., & Liaudet, L.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Feihl, François
Venue
Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-09
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
179-213
ISSN
0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060476201
Cited by
151
References
437
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
Keywords
nitric oxide, septic shock, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis pathophysiology, transgenic mice, clinical experience, intensive care
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Enzyme Inhibitors, Free Radicals, Humans, Inflammation, Nitric Oxide, Shock, Septic, Up-Regulation, Apoptosis, Nitric Oxide Synthase, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review