Cited by 479Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Prediction of in vivo drug metabolism in the human liver from in vitro metabolism data

Iwatsubo, Takafumi, Hirota, Noriko, Ooie, Tsuyoshi, Suzuki, Hiroshi, Shimada, Noriaki, Chiba, Kan, Ishizaki, Takashi, Green, Carol E. +2 more·1997·Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

As a new approach to predicting in vivo drug metabolism in humans, scaling of in vivo metabolic clearance from in vitro data obtained using human liver microsomes or hepatocytes is described in this review, based on the large number of literature data. Successful predictions were obtained for verapamil, loxtidine (lavoltidine), diazepam, lidocaine, phenacetin and some other compounds where CLint,in vitro is comparable with CLint,in vivo. On the other hand, for some metabolic reactions, differences in CLint,in vitro and CLint,in vivo greater than 5-fold were observed. The following factors are considered to be the cause of the differences: (1) metabolism in tissues other than liver, (2) incorrect assumption of rapid equilibrium of drugs between blood and hepatocytes, (3) presence of active transport through the sinusoidal membrane, and (4) interindividual variability. Furthermore, the possibility of predicting in vivo drug metabolic clearance from results obtained using a recombinant system of human P450 isozyme was described for a model compound, YM796, where the predicted metabolic clearances obtained from the recombinant system, taking account of the content of the P450 isozyme CYP3A4 in the human microsomes, were comparable with the observed clearances using human liver microsomes containing different amounts of CYP3A4. Even in the case where the first-pass metabolism exhibits nonlinearity, it appears to be possible to predict in vivo metabolic clearance from in vitro metabolic data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0163-7258(96)00184-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iwatsubo, T., Hirota, N., Ooie, T., Suzuki, H., Shimada, N., Chiba, K., Ishizaki, T., Green, C. E., Tyson, C. A., & Sugiyama, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • SRI International (US)
Corresponding author
Sugiyama, Yuichi
Venue
Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-01
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
147-171
ISSN
0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077984371
Cited by
479
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 24
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
in vivo drug metabolism, human liver, metabolic clearance, human liver microsomes, hepatocytes, CYP3A4, first-pass metabolism, interindividual variability, tissue distribution, active transport, verapamil, diazepam, lidocaine, phenacetin
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Active, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Liver, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Microsomes, Liver, Models, Biological, Pharmacokinetics, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review