Controlling protest: New directions for research on the social control of protest
Abstract
Work on repression within the social movements literature has largely focused on state-based and coercive repression, despite both the empirical importance of private and non-coercive forms of protest control and the theoretical leverage studying other forms of protest control could offer. This paper argues that scholars should shift from studying repression, which as a terminology carries connotations about state-based and coercive action, and instead focus on the “social control of protest.” The paper then manufactures a literature on private forms of protest control, culling existing work from disparate fields and literatures. These works are organized using a previously published typology of repressive forms that covers such diverse actions as vigilantism and countermovement violence. This organization reveals that empirical research has been done on private protest control even if it has not been named as such or been connected to a coherent body of scholarship on the subject. The paper then examines possible directions for future research that could facilitate the growth of scholarship on private protest control.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Private actors, whom traditional repression research has relatively ignored to its detriment despite some recent rising interest, also have been overtly coercive online.
“Private actors, whom traditional repression research has relatively ignored to its detriment (40) despite some recent rising interest in the topic (22), also have been overtly coercive online (Table 1, cell 9).”
From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
Tanks, Tear Gas, and Taxes: Toward a Theory of Movement Repression
Earl, J. (2003) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00175 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control
Earl, J. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102609 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Self-citationEarl, J. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl8198 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Self-citationLimiting Dissent: The Mechanisms of State Repression in the USA
BOYKOFF, J. (2007) · Social Movement Studies · doi:10.1080/14742830701666988 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
- Authors
- Earl, J.
- Corresponding author
- Earl, Jennifer
- ORCID
- Earl, Jennifer
- Venue
- Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change
- Publisher
- Emerald (MCB UP )
- Published
- 2004-12-17
- Pages
- 55-83
- ISSN
- 0163-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2496253376
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in social movements, conflicts and change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Communism, Protests, Social Movements
- Keywords
- repression, vigilantism, social movements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review