Psychological intervention in cancer patients: a randomized study
Abstract
We examined the long-term effects of a behavioral intervention on the psychological distress of patients recently diagnosed with localized cancer, who were being treated at Hadassah University Hospital. All 116 patients who met the inclusion criteria (49 men and 67 women) were randomized into an intervention group and a control group on a 3:1 basis. The intervention chosen was Progressive Muscle Relaxation with Guided Imagery, which is intended to decrease psychological distress and increase the patient's sense of internal control. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Impact of Events Scale (IES) were used to assess psychological distress within 1 month of diagnosis, 3 months later (shortly before starting intervention), and 6 months after the end of the intervention. At the final assessment, the effect of the behavioral intervention on psychological distress was positive. The effect was relatively modest but statistically significant when assessed in terms of the Global Severity Index (GSI) (a decrease of 2.3 points in the GSI of the treatment group as compared to an increase of 1.2 points in the GSI of the control group P=.005). Despite these moderately positive findings, we suggest that the results might be more meaningful if cancer patients are first screened for psychological distress to exclude those with a low distress level that does not justify intervention, and only then randomized for participation in the study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
El tratamiento de las condiciones psicológicas asociadas al cáncer se ha propuesto como uno de los objetivos de la intervención integral y multidisciplinar de pacientes oncológicos.
“En este sentido, el tratamiento de las condiciones psicológicas asociadas al cáncer se ha propuesto como uno de los objetivos de la intervención integral y multidisciplinar de pacientes oncológicos (7) .”
From Terapia de aceptación y compromiso en un caso de trastorno mixto de ansiedad y depresión en una paciente con cáncer (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Baider, L., Peretz, T., Hadani, P. E., & Koch, U.
- Affiliations
- Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Baider, Lea
- ORCID
- Koch, Uwe
- Venue
- General Hospital Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 272-277
- ISSN
- 0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984095812
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Keywords
- psychological distress, cancer patients, progressive muscle relaxation, guided imagery, behavioral interventions, long-term effects, Brief Symptom Inventory, Impact of Event Scale, psychological screening, localized cancer
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Relaxation, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Patient Care Team, Personality Inventory, Relaxation Therapy, Sick Role, Imagery, Psychotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review