The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators
Xu, Z. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2006.890678 · Cited by 2,678
Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Xu, Z., & Yager, R. R. (2006) · International Journal of General Systems · doi:10.1080/03081070600574353 · Cited by 2,356
Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making☆
XU, Z. (2007) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2006.12.019 · Cited by 848
Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making
Xu, Z., & Yager, R. R. (2008) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2007.08.008 · Cited by 594
Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622016300019 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, D. H., & Choi, C.-H.
- Venue
- Fuzzy Sets and Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-113
- ISSN
- 0165-0114 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969921454
- Cited by
- 1,010
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0165-0114(98)00271-1
- The paper
- Hong, D. H., & Choi, C.-H. (2000). Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0114(98)00271-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
