Cited by 84Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchEpilepsy research and treatmentNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Long-term maintenance of mature hippocampal slices in vitro

Xiang, Zhongmin, Hrabetova, Sabina, Moskowitz, Shaye I., Casaccia-Bonnefil, Patrizia, Young, Steven R., Nimmrich, Volker C., Tiedge, Henri, Einheber, Stephen, Karnup, Sergei, Bianchi, Riccardo, Bergold, Peter J.·2000·Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Abstract

Cultures of primary neurons or thin brain slices are typically prepared from immature animals. We introduce a method to prepare hippocampal slice cultures from mature rats aged 20-30 days. Mature slice cultures retain hippocampal cytoarchitecture and synaptic connections up to 3 months in vitro. Spontaneous epileptiform activity is rarely observed suggesting long-term retention of normal neuronal excitability and of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic networks. Picrotoxin, a GABAergic Cl(-) channel antagonist, induced characteristic interictal-like bursts that originated in the CA3 region, but not in the CA1 region. These data suggest that mature slice cultures displayed long-term retention of GABAergic inhibitory synapses that effectively suppressed synchronized burst activity via recurrent excitatory synapses of CA3 pyramidal cells. Mature slice cultures lack the reactive synaptogenesis, spontaneous epileptiform activity, and short life span that limit the use of slice cultures isolated from immature rats. Mature slice cultures are anticipated to be a useful addition for the in vitro study of normal and pathological hippocampal function.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0270(00)00197-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 84

Metadata

Authors
Xiang, Z., Hrabetova, S., Moskowitz, S. I., Casaccia-Bonnefil, P., Young, S. R., Nimmrich, V. C., Tiedge, H., Einheber, S., Karnup, S., Bianchi, R., & Bergold, P. J.
Affiliations
  • State University of New York (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Bergold, Peter J.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
145-154
ISSN
0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118553551
Cited by
84
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS310010)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
hippocampal slice cultures, GABAergic inhibition, picrotoxin, CA3 pyramidal cells, spontaneous epileptiform activity, synaptic networks
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Electrophysiology, Hippocampus, Microscopy, Electron, Neuroglia, Neurons, Organ Culture Techniques, Piperazines, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, 6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, Mossy Fibers, Hippocampal, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term maintenance of mature hippocampal slices in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0165-0270(00)00197-7
The paper
Xiang, Z., Hrabetova, S., Moskowitz, S. I., Casaccia-Bonnefil, P., Young, S. R., Nimmrich, V. C., Tiedge, H., Einheber, S., Karnup, S., Bianchi, R., & Bergold, P. J. (2000). Long-term maintenance of mature hippocampal slices in vitro. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0270(00)00197-7