Determination of information flow direction among brain structures by a modified directed transfer function (dDTF) method
Abstract
A modification of directed transfer function-direct DTF-is proposed for the analysis of direct information transfer among brain structures on the basis of local field potentials (LFP). Comparison of results obtained by the analysis of simulated and experimental data with a new dDTF and DTF method is shown. A new measure to estimate direct causal relations between signals is defined. The present results demonstrate the effectiveness of the new dDTF method and indicate that the dDTF method can be used to obtain the reliable patterns of connections between various brain structures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Algorithms have been developed for estimating functional connectivity from electrophysiological source signals derived from EEG or MEG, including directed transfer function, adaptive directed transfer function, direct directed transfer function, and partial directed coherence.
“Algorithms have been developed for estimating functional connectivity from electrophysiological source signals derived from EEG (or MEG), including directed transfer function (DTF) algorithm (98), the adaptive DTF (ADTF) (99–101), direct DTF (dDTF) (102), and partial directed coherence (PDC) (103).”
From Electrophysiological source imaging: A noninvasive window to brain dynamics (2018) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 375
- Authors
- Korzeniewska, A., Mańczak, M., Kamiński, M., Blinowska, K. J., & Kasicki, S.
- Affiliations
- Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego (PL)
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Kasicki, Stefan
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 195-207
- ISSN
- 0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983523765
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- International Journal of Neuroscience
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- directed transfer function, brain connectivity, local field potentials, information flow direction, brain structure
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Computer Simulation, Electroencephalography, Electrophysiology, Locomotion, Mathematics, Mental Processes, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Transfer, Psychology, Multivariate Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
