Adolescent life events as predictors of adult depression
Abstract
Background Among adults, life events predict future episodes of major depression as well as a range of anxiety disorders. While studies have begun to examine this issue in adolescents, few studies rely upon prospective epidemiological designs to document relationships between adolescent life events and adult major depression.Method An epidemiologically-selected sample of 776 young people living in Upstate New York received DSM-based psychiatric assessments and an assessment of life events in 1986. Psychopathology was again assessed in 1992. The current study examined the predictive relationship between life events in 1986 and depression as well as anxiety in 1992, controlling for depression/anxiety in 1986.Results Adolescent life events predicted an increased risk for major depression diagnosis in adulthood. When analyzed continuously, an association emerged with symptoms of major depression as well as with symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder. However, this association with generalized anxiety disorder was limited to females.Conclusions Life events in adolescence predict risk for major depression during early adulthood.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interpersonal stress, psychosocial adversity, and the emotional climate in the family have been related to adolescents' symptoms of disorders.
“Interpersonal stress (Carter & Garber, 2011; Krackow & Rudolph, 2008; Pine, Cohen, Johnson & Brooks, 2002), psychosocial adversity (Foster, Webster, Weissman et al., 2008), and the emotional climate in the family (Nomura et al., 2002) have been related to adolescents’ symptoms of disorders.”
From Prospective Relations between Family Conflict and Adolescent Maladjustment: Security in the Family System as a Mediating Process (2015) · cites this paper as Pine, Cohen, Johnson & Brooks, 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 184
- Authors
- Pine, D. S., Cohen, P., Johnson, J. G., & Brook, J. S.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Mental Health (US)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pine, Daniel S
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-57
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093594342
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 9.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K02-MH01391, MH-36971, R01MH036971, MH16432, MH43878)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 03188, R01DA003188, K05DA000244)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, adult depression, generalized anxiety disorder, anxiety disorders, early adulthood, prospective prediction, sex differences, psychopathology
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prognosis, Sex Factors, Epidemiologic Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review