Cited by 20Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

The Long-Term Outcome of a Benzodiazepine Discontinuation Programme in Depressed Outpatients

Couvée, Jaap E., Timmermans, Manuela A.Y., Zitman, Frans G.·2002·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Objective To assess longitudinally the prescription of psychotropic drugs in depressed patients after they participated in a benzodiazepine discontinuation programme.Methods Two hundred and thirty depressed patients on chronic benzodiazepine therapy took part in a discontinuation programme conducted in 36 general practices. After 2.3 years (S.D.=0.65, range 0.1-3.6) medical records were reviewed.Results Follow-up was achieved for 207 (90%) patients. Twenty-five (12%) patients remained benzodiazepine free during the full follow-up period. The majority (n=181, 87%) was prescribed benzodiazepines at an average of 13 (+/-14) mg of diazepam equivalents for 537 (+/-375) days. Fifty-five (74% of 74) of the successfully discontinued patients restarted benzodiazepine therapy. Sixty-eight (33%) patients were prescribed benzodiazepines during the whole follow-up period. Successful taper predicted no or lower subsequent benzodiazepine prescription rates (OR=7.3; 95% CI: 2-16). No influence of GP policy towards benzodiazepine prescription could be detected (P=0.275). Antidepressants were prescribed in 115 (55%) patients for an average duration of 476 (+/-360) days. There was no difference in benzodiazepine prescription (dosage, duration) between patients who had or had not been prescribed an antidepressant.Limitations Patients were not been diagnosed systematically during the follow-up period.Conclusions If measured longitudinally, the rate of benzodiazepine prescription after discontinuation is much higher than reported in previous studies that have measured this cross-sectionally. Successful discontinuation is a strong predictor of modest or no future benzodiazepine prescription. Two-thirds of patients altered their benzodiazepine usage after taking part in a discontinuation programme. Treatment with antidepressants does not seem to influence benzodiazepine prescription. Patients' request (not GPs'policy) seems to be an important factor in continuing or resuming benzodiazepine prescription.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00330-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 20

Authors
Couvée, J. E., Timmermans, M. A. Y., & Zitman, F. G.
Corresponding author
Couvée, Jaap E.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
133-141
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065430497
Cited by
20
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
benzodiazepine discontinuation, depression, benzodiazepine prescriptions, antidepressants, tapering, general practice, long-term outcomes, benzodiazepine dependence
MeSH terms
Adult, Benzodiazepines, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Drug Prescriptions, Psychotropic Drugs, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review