Cited by 207Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

A different depression: clinical distinctions between bipolar and unipolar depression

Bowden, Charles L.·2005·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis can prolong the suffering of patients with bipolar disorder. Accurate early diagnosis is sometimes difficult, however, particularly because patients often present in the depressive phase, which can easily be mistaken for unipolar depression. Unfortunately, therapy appropriate for unipolar depression can increase the risk of manic switch or cycle acceleration in bipolar disorder, especially in those with a family history of bipolarity and suicide, although some antidepressants may be useful in some bipolar patients. In addition, most currently available mood stabilizers, though effective in managing mania, do not effectively resolve depression. In contrast, lamotrigine has shown activity in bipolar depression and has a very low risk of manic switch. Bipolar depression, compared with unipolar depression, is more likely to be associated with hypersomnia, motor retardation, mood lability, early onset, and a family history of bipolar disorder. Awareness of these distinctions can greatly improve diagnosis of bipolar disorder and provide an opportunity for effective therapeutic intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(03)00194-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 207

Authors
Bowden, C. L.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bowden, Charles L.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
84
Issue
2-3
Pages
117-125
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152773535
Cited by
207
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar depression, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, misdiagnosis, manic switch, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, lamotrigine, hypersomnia, emotional lability, family history of bipolar disorder, suicide risk
MeSH terms
Lamotrigine, Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Triazines, Antimanic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review