Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review
Abstract
Background Research suggests that co-morbid diabetes and depression is common; however, the implications for clinical practice remain unclear. This paper reviews the current epidemiological evidence on comorbid diabetes and depression, in order to identify the key publications which could both inform practice and identify gaps in knowledge and research.Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify published literature on the epidemiology of diabetes and depression. In order to review evidence on up-to-date knowledge of recent research and innovations in care literature searches for the last five years (August 2006-August 2011) were conducted. To identify relevant literature, electronic databases MEDLINE, Psych-INFO and EMBASE were searched for English language articles in peer-reviewed journals.Results High rates of co-morbidity of depression and diabetes have been reported. The prevalence rate of depression is more than three-times higher in people with type 1 diabetes (12%, range 5.8-43.3% vs. 3.2%, range 2.7-11.4%) and nearly twice as high in people with type 2 diabetes (19.1%, range 6.5-33% vs. 10.7%, range 3.8-19.4%) compared to those without. Women with diabetes and also women without diabetes experience a higher prevalence of depression than men. Reviewed studies provide support for a modest relationship between diabetes and depressive symptoms, but the exact direction of this relationship remains unclear.Limitations Most studies reviewed were cross-sectional and this limits any conclusions about the causal nature and direction of the relationship between diabetes and depression. Variation in measurement methods, lack of longitudinal data and few studies outside Europe and America limit the generalizability of the findings of this review.Conclusions Current research suggests that the risk of developing depression is increased in people with diabetes; however, further studies are required in order to establish the nature of the relationship between depression, glycaemic control and the development of diabetes complications, and make appropriate recommendations for treatment and to support self-management of diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Depression is at least three times higher in people with type 1 diabetes than in healthy individuals.
“Furthermore, depression is at least three times higher in people with type 1 diabetes than in healthy individuals.5”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for adult type 1 diabetes management: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [5]
The prevalence of major depressive disorder is more than threefold higher in people with type 1 diabetes than in those without, with greater rates in diabetic women than men.
“Correspondingly, the prevalence of MDD is nearly twice as high in people with type 2 diabetes [159] and more than threefold higher in people with type 1 diabetes than those without, with greater rates in diabetic women than men [160].”
From The menace of obesity to depression and anxiety prevalence (2022) · cites this paper as [160]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 1,229
- Authors
- Roy, T., & Lloyd, C. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lloyd, Cathy E.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 142
- Pages
- S8-S21
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007473119
- Cited by
- 1,229
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- depression, diabetes mellitus, comorbidities, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, depression prevalence, sex differences, glycemic control, diabetes complications, self-management, depressive symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Blood Glucose, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, North America, Risk Factors, Risk-Taking, Self Care, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Sex Distribution, Diabetes Complications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review