The role of pubertal progress in the development of depression in early adolescence
Abstract
Background Lack of longitudinal studies on the relationship between pubertal progress and changes in depression during adolescence.Methods Changes in the Anxious/Depressed scores of the Child Behavior Checklist and Youth Self-Report were predicted from pubertal progress. Subjects were young adolescents from the Dutch general population, aged 10-12 years at T1 and 12-14 years at T2. From the 1327 parent reports, 207 showed a change that exceeded the cut-off for inclusion in the analyses. From the 1414 self-reports, 476 exceeded the cut-off.Results Apart from increase, decrease in depression was common. Pubertal progress was inversely related to the parent reports of boys' depression only.Conclusion Self-perceptions of depressive symptoms change independently from pubertal progress, whereas changes observable to parents are inversely related to it in boys.Limitations Progress was not measured across the whole pubertal development.Clinical relevance One can expect parents to observe a decrease in boys' depression in the period when most pubertal progress is made. More attention should be paid to decreases in depressive symptomatology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The role of pubertal development in the onset of depression in girls remains unclear.
“The role of pubertal development in the onset of depression in girls still remains unclear.”
From Subthreshold Symptoms of Depression in Preadolescent Girls Are Stable and Predictive of Depressive Disorders (2008) · cites this paper as [18]
A main effect of pubertal development on depression has not been found consistently.
“A main effect of pubertal development on depression has not been found consistently.17,18”
From Subthreshold Symptoms of Depression in Preadolescent Girls Are Stable and Predictive of Depressive Disorders (2008) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Laitinen-Krispijn, S., van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Laitinen-Krispijn, Saara
- ORCID
- Verhulst, Frank C
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 211-215
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037900711
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- adolescent depression, early adolescence, depressive symptoms, sex differences, parent report, self-report, Child Behavior Checklist, Youth Self-Report, longitudinal change
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Puberty, Regression Analysis, Self-Assessment, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review