Effect of apomorphine on motor and cognitive function in melancholic patients: a preliminary report
Abstract
Given the many clinical parallels between melancholia and disorders associated with impaired dopaminergic function such as Parkinson's Disease (PD), it has been hypothesised that major depressive disorder, and in particular the psychomotor features of melancholic depression, may also be associated with a hypodopaminergic state. If this is the case, then the use of a dopamine agonist might lead to reversal of both the cognitive and motor impairments seen in these patients. A double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over design was used to test the effect of apomorphine on motor and cognitive function in seven melancholic subjects (as defined by the CORE instrument) and five control subjects. The testing battery included the following items: finger tapping, rapid alternating movements, verbal fluency, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task, digit symbol substitution task and simple and complex reaction times. The independent t-test, after covarying for age, revealed significant impairment in melancholic subjects for the walking task and digit symbol substitution at baseline. Results of the ANCOVA revealed no impact of time or drug condition, either alone or in combination, upon task performance in either group whether assessed separately or jointly. Results of a MANCOVA revealed that apomorphine impaired performance on some cognitive tasks, and that this was seen to a lesser extent in melancholics than control subjects. There was no evidence that the dopamine agonist apomorphine improved cognitive or motor function in subjects with strictly defined melancholia, suggesting that psychomotor retardation is not associated with a hypodopaminergic state. Our conclusions, however, were limited by small sample size; minimal baseline task impairment in depressed compared to control subjects; mild sedation in many subjects during task performance; and lack of serum apomorphine levels.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Austin, M.-P., Mitchell, P., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Hickie, I., Parker, G., Chan, J., & Eyers, K.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Austin, Marie-Paule
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 207-215
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021624124
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- apomorphine, endogenous depression, dopamine agonists, hypodopaminergic state, psychomotor retardation, motor function, cognitive function, major depressive disorder, dopaminergic dysfunction, digit symbol substitution, reaction time
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Apomorphine, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parkinson Disease, Psychomotor Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Dopamine Agonists, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review