Cited by 162Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Normal personality traits and comorbidity among phobic, panic and major depressive disorders

Bienvenu, O.Joseph, Brown, Clayton, Samuels, Jack F., Liang, Kung-Yee, Costa, Paul T., Eaton, William W., Nestadt, Gerald·2001·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

High comorbidity among anxiety and depressive conditions is a consistent but not well-understood finding. The current study examines how normal personality traits relate to this comorbidity. In the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Follow-up Study, psychiatrists administered the full Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry to 320 subjects, all of whom completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. The disorders of interest were simple phobia, social phobia, agoraphobia, panic disorder, and major depression. Analyses were carried out with second-order generalized estimating equations. The unadjusted summary odds ratio (SOR - or weighted mean odds ratio) for all five disorders was 1.72 (95% confidence interval=1.21-2.46). Neuroticism, introversion, younger age, and female gender were all significant predictors of prevalence of disorders. After adjustment for the relationships between these personality and demographic predictors and prevalence, the association among disorders was much weaker (SOR=1.11, 95% CI=0.79-1.56). However, subjects with high extraversion had a SOR 213% as high (95% CI=102-444%) as those with low extraversion (1.60 vs. 0.75). Therefore, neuroticism and introversion are associated with increased comorbidity due to relationships in common with the prevalence of the different disorders. In contrast, extraversion is associated with increased comorbidity per se.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00228-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 162

Authors
Bienvenu, O. J., Brown, C., Samuels, J. F., Liang, K.-Y., Costa, P. T., Eaton, W. W., & Nestadt, G.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bienvenu, O.Joseph
  • Liang, Kung-Yee
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
73-85
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986066265
Cited by
162
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH47447, R01MH047447, T32MH-14592, R01MH050616, R01-MH50616, T32MH014592)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
comorbidities, personality traits, neuroticism, extraversion, introversion, phobia, panic disorder, major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, specific phobia, anxiety disorders, prevalence, gender differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review